Drug Cartridge Encoding for Tolerance-Compensated Injection Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing drug delivery systems lack accurate control over injection processes due to manufacturing tolerances and variations in injector components, affecting the delivery characteristics such as velocity and force profiles.

Innovation Solution

Measuring and encoding relevant features of drug delivery components, like drug cartridges, using tags (e.g., RFID, barcode) to adjust the injection process based on measured values, ensuring accurate delivery by compensating for manufacturing variations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If manufacturing tolerances are tightened to improve component consistency, then manufacturing precision improves, but manufacturing cost and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent consistencyVSAvoidmanufacturing process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary measurement of component features (orifice diameter, cartridge dimensions) during manufacturing and encodes this data on tags before the components are used. This preliminary action captures the actual variations, allowing the delivery system to compensate for them later without requiring tighter manufacturing tolerances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback loop where measured component features are encoded on tags, retrieved during drug delivery, and used to adjust delivery parameters. This feedback mechanism allows the system to adapt to manufacturing variations dynamically, resolving the contradiction by making precision achievable through measurement and adjustment rather than strict manufacturing control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of manufacture

If component manufacturing tolerances are relaxed to reduce cost, then ease of manufacture improves, but injection accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidinjection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system measures and encodes component features during manufacturing when the components are readily accessible. This preliminary measurement captures the actual dimensions and characteristics, allowing later compensation without requiring expensive tight tolerances during manufacturing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the approach from controlling physical dimensions through manufacturing precision to controlling delivery parameters based on measured values. By adjusting delivery parameters (force, velocity, timing) based on encoded component data, the system achieves accurate injection despite manufacturing variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If component features are measured and encoded for each instance, then injection accuracy improves, but device complexity and measurement requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinjection accuracyVSAvoidmeasurement and encoding system
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the critical features that affect injection accuracy (orifice diameter, cartridge dimensions, air bubble size) and encodes this minimal necessary data on tags. This selective extraction approach avoids the need to measure and store all possible component parameters, reducing system complexity while maintaining injection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a digital copy of the critical physical features by encoding measured values on tags attached to components. This copy allows the delivery system to reference and compensate for manufacturing variations without needing the physical components to be perfectly precise, simplifying the overall system by separating measurement from delivery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Manufacturing precision

If dynamic adjustment of delivery parameters is implemented, then injection accuracy improves, but control system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinjection accuracyVSAvoidcontrol system
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary measurement and encoding of component features, so that when delivery occurs, the adjustment parameters are already determined. This preliminary action shifts complexity from the real-time control moment to the preparation phase, simplifying the actual delivery control while maintaining accuracy through pre-calculated adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12465689B2Encoding information for drug delivery
Publication Date: 2025.11.11 PORTAL INSTRUMENTS INC
  • US12465689B2 patent drawing
  • US12465689B2 patent drawing
  • US12465689B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An approach to providing predictable and uniform drug delivery across many instances of an automated drug delivery procedure involves measuring features of the drug delivery system prior to delivery. An automated drug delivery procedure is configured to compensate for or otherwise accommodate the impact of these features based on the measured features. In some examples, the measured features are encoded by value or by reference to an external database onto the drug containing component, for example, by affixing a tag (e.g., RFID, barcode, etc.) to the component. At the time of drug delivery, the features are accessed, for example using the affixed tag, and the drug delivery procedure is controlled according to the features.