Two-Stage Drug Particle Drying Process

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current secondary drying processes for pharmaceutical compositions are inefficient, time-consuming, and result in low product yields, particularly for small, low-density particles, due to issues with solvent removal and uniformity, leading to high residual solvent content and processing losses.

Innovation Solution

A process involving atomization of a drug and excipient solution, followed by introduction into a drying chamber with mechanical agitation and a stripping gas, maintaining a total pressure less than 0.75 atm, to facilitate solvent removal and achieve low residual solvent content, while circulating particles to enhance mass transfer and prevent entrainment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of substance

If fluidized-bed dryers are used to remove residual solvent, then solvent removal capability is improved, but product yield deteriorates due to particle entrainment in gas stream

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresidual solvent contentVSAvoidproduct yield
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The drying process is segmented into two distinct stages: (1) fluidized-bed drying to rapidly remove bulk solvent, and (2) tray drying to remove residual solvent. This segmentation allows each stage to be optimized for its specific function, with the fluidized-bed handling high-moisture removal and the tray dryer handling final drying, thereby preventing particle loss while achieving low residual solvent content.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The fluidized-bed drying is performed as a preliminary action before tray drying. By removing the bulk of the solvent first through fluidized-bed drying, the subsequent tray drying stage operates on material with significantly reduced moisture content, making the overall process more efficient and reducing the time required for the secondary drying stage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If tray dryers are used for secondary drying, then product yield is maintained, but drying time increases substantially

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct yieldVSAvoiddrying time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The fluidized-bed drying is performed as a preliminary action before tray drying. By removing the bulk of the solvent first through fluidized-bed drying, the subsequent tray drying stage operates on material with significantly reduced moisture content, making the overall process more efficient and reducing the time required for the secondary drying stage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The two drying stages are connected in a continuous workflow where the output of the fluidized-bed dryer becomes the input for the tray dryer. This continuous action ensures that material flows seamlessly through both drying stages without interruption, maximizing the efficiency of solvent removal while maintaining product yield.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Loss of substance

If rotary dryers are used to remove residual solvent, then solvent removal capability is improved, but processing time increases substantially

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresidual solvent contentVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The drying process is segmented into two distinct stages: (1) fluidized-bed drying to rapidly remove bulk solvent, and (2) tray drying to remove residual solvent. This segmentation allows each stage to be optimized for its specific function, with the fluidized-bed handling high-moisture removal and the tray dryer handling final drying, thereby preventing particle loss while achieving low residual solvent content.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses a simple, cost-effective tray dryer for the secondary drying stage rather than expensive rotary dryers. The tray dryer, while less sophisticated, is sufficient for removing residual solvent from pre-dried material and offers easier operation and lower cost, making it an ideal choice for the final drying stage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

4Quantity of substance

If spray-drying is used to form particles, then drug concentration enhancement is improved, but residual solvent content increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrug concentrationVSAvoidresidual solvent content
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The drying process is segmented into two distinct stages: (1) fluidized-bed drying to rapidly remove bulk solvent, and (2) tray drying to remove residual solvent. This segmentation allows each stage to be optimized for its specific function, with the fluidized-bed handling high-moisture removal and the tray dryer handling final drying, thereby preventing particle loss while achieving low residual solvent content.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the drying parameters by using a two-stage approach with different temperature, airflow, and duration parameters optimized for each stage. The fluidized-bed dryer operates at higher temperatures with intense airflow for rapid bulk drying, while the tray dryer uses milder conditions for gentle final drying, thereby achieving low residual solvent content while preserving drug stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This process allows for timely and cost-effective solvent removal, high product yields, efficient solvent recovery, and reduced worker exposure, achieving residual solvent levels below 0.1 wt% in a closed vessel system.

Implementation Method 1

circulating the drug-containing particles within the drying chamber by means of a mechanical agitator independent of the wall

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical agitation: Stirring

Implementation Method 2

flowing a stripping gas through the drying chamber; removing the stripping gas and at least a portion of the solvent from the drying chamber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEvaporation: Evaporation

Implementation Method 3

atomizing the solution into droplets and removing at least a portion of the solvent from the droplets

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAtomization: Aerosol

Data Source

PatentUS9265731B2Drying of drug-containing particles
Publication Date: 2016.02.23 LONZA BEND INC
  • US9265731B2 patent drawing
  • US9265731B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A secondary drying process is disclosed for removing residual solvent from drug-containing particles that have been formed by solvent-based processes, the secondary drying process utilizing a combination of vacuum, agitation, and a stripping gas.