Drum Pedal Rotary Shaft Bearing Assembly Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional drum pedals are heavy, leading to increased risk of tendinitis and reduced precision and rapidity in striking, and are often complex and costly due to numerous pieces and manufacturing tolerances.

Innovation Solution

A drum pedal design featuring a support with a bearing assembly positioned between the actuation and return mechanisms, using a rotary shaft with a bearing chamber that transfers rotation to the outer side of the bearing, allowing for lighter construction and improved balance and precision.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If the drum pedal is made heavier to increase striking power, then the power and solidity of the pedal is improved, but the risk of tendinitis increases and the precision and rapidity of striking deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestriking powerVSAvoidprecision and rapidity of striking
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The drum pedal is divided into separate functional modules: a support structure, a rotary shaft assembly with bearing, a beater mechanism, an actuation mechanism, and a return mechanism. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently, enabling the use of lighter materials and reduced mass in non-critical areas while maintaining striking power where needed, thereby improving precision and rapidity without sacrificing force.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a bearing assembly that changes the friction parameter of the rotary shaft, allowing for smoother rotation with less effort. This parameter change enables the use of lighter pedal components while maintaining or improving striking power, as the bearing reduces the force required to initiate and maintain rotation, thereby improving both precision and rapidity of striking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Force

If the drum pedal is made heavier to increase striking power, then the power of the pedal is improved, but the return mechanism needs to be more heavily tensioned which increases the risk of tendinitis

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestriking powerVSAvoidrisk of tendinitis
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The bearing assembly fundamentally changes the friction parameter of the rotary shaft, reducing it to minimal levels. This allows the return mechanism to operate with much lower tension forces while still effectively returning the beater to its initial position. The reduced tension in the return mechanism directly lowers the risk of tendinitis, as the user's foot does not need to overcome heavy spring tension during the return stroke.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The bearing acts as an intermediary element between the rotary shaft and the support structure, mediating the interaction by reducing friction. This intermediary allows the system to achieve the same return function with significantly lower forces, reducing the harmful effect of heavy return mechanism tension on the user's tendons and muscles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Weight of moving object

If more pieces are added to the drum pedal to reduce weight and complexity, then the weight and manufacturing cost are reduced, but the vulnerability to adjustment issues between pieces increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweight of pedalVSAvoidadjustment stability between pieces
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple functions into integrated assemblies: the bearing assembly integrates the rotary shaft support and rotation function; the actuation mechanism integrates the foot plate, chain, and sprocket; the return mechanism integrates the spring and mounting components. This merging reduces the total number of separate adjustment interfaces while maintaining the lightweight design, thereby improving reliability by reducing the number of potential adjustment issues between pieces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design achieves a precise and rapid striking action while minimizing weight and manufacturing complexity, reducing the risk of tendinitis and lowering costs by simplifying the number of pieces and improving balance and stability.

Implementation Method 1

Including a bearing assembly into the drum pedal can improve smooth rotation of the rotary shaft

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 2

Said return mechanism may include a pre-tensioned element, such as a spring or any other suitable element

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS11450298B2Drum pedal, retrofitting assembly for a drum pedal, and method of retrofitting a drum pedal
Publication Date: 2022.09.20 COCCA DONATO
  • US11450298B2 patent drawing
  • US11450298B2 patent drawing
  • US11450298B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Drum pedal for striking a drum, the pedal comprising:a support having at least one leg;a rotary shaft borne by said support;a beater mounted on said rotary shaft and configured to rotate upon rotation of said rotary shaft, wherein the beater is configured to strike the drum;an actuation mechanism for rotating the beater in a first direction towards the drum;a return mechanism for rotating the beater in a second direction opposite the first direction away from the drum.