Dry Electrode Fabrication via 3D Graphene Framework Compression

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional wet coating processes for energy storage device electrodes are plagued by solvent toxicity, adhesion issues, corrosion, and high manufacturing costs, with solvents being time-consuming to remove and causing particle disconnection from the current collector.

Innovation Solution

A dry electrode fabrication method involving the mixing of graphene nanosheets and nanoparticles to form a nanocomposite, which is compressed and rolled into a 3D architecture framework, then laminated onto a surface-modified current collector, eliminating the need for solvents and reducing binder usage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If wet coating process is used to fabricate electrodes, then the electrode can be formed with active material and binder, but solvent toxicity and corrosion issues arise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrode fabricationVSAvoidsolvent toxicity and corrosion
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the harmful solvent component from the wet coating process entirely, transitioning to a solvent-free dry coating method where active material particles and binder are directly compressed without requiring dissolution in toxic solvents

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the physical state parameters of the coating process from liquid slurry requiring solvent evaporation to dry powder compression, eliminating the need for solvent removal and associated toxicity and corrosion problems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of manufacture

If wet coating process with solvent is used, then electrode coating can be applied, but time is consumed for solvent removal and manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrode coating applicationVSAvoidsolvent removal time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates the solvent evaporation step from the manufacturing process by using a dry coating method where particles are directly compressed into the electrode structure without requiring thermal or vacuum drying

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention skips the entire solvent removal phase by never introducing solvent in the first place, transitioning directly from slurry preparation to compression molding, thereby eliminating time-consuming drying operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

3Ease of manufacture

If binder is dissolved in solvent for wet coating, then electrode structure can be formed, but particles lose contact with current collector and device performance damages

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrode structure formationVSAvoidparticle contact with current collector
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the chemical bonding mechanism (binder dissolution and adhesion) with a mechanical compression system where particles are physically pressed onto the current collector, ensuring direct contact through applied pressure rather than chemical adhesion

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses a composite structure where active material particles are mechanically interlocked with the current collector through compression, creating a physically stable assembly that maintains particle contact without relying on binder chemistry

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method results in cost-effective, eco-friendly energy storage devices with enhanced performance, increased volumetric storage capacity, reduced internal resistance, and lower production costs, while avoiding toxic solvents and conductive blockages.

Implementation Method 1

The nanocomposite is compressed to obtain a compacted material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression: Compression

Implementation Method 2

The compacted material is rolled to obtain a three dimensional graphene architecture framework (3D-GAF) active film

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRolling: Roller

Implementation Method 3

The (3D-GAF) active film is then laminated on a surface modified current collector to obtain a three dimensional graphene architecture framework dry electrode

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLamination: Lamination

Data Source

PatentUS11456451B2Method for preparing dry electrode
Publication Date: 2022.09.27 NANOSPAN INDIA PTE LTD
  • US11456451B2 patent drawing
  • US11456451B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for preparing a dry electrode is disclosed. The method comprises mixing of nanoparticles and graphene nanosheets in powder form to obtain a nanocomposite. The nanocomposite is compressed to obtain a compacted material, which is rolled to obtain a three dimensional graphene architecture framework (3D-GAF) active film. The 3D-GAF active film is laminated on a current collector to obtain a three dimensional graphene architecture framework dry electrode for next generation energy storage devices.