Trigger Point Dry Needling With Dynamic Movement Protocols

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current Trigger Point Dry Needling (TDN) methods often fail to induce a Local Twitch Response (LTR) efficiently, leading to ineffective treatment of myofascial trigger points, and lack integration with modern patient movement patterns and controlled needle movement protocols to optimize therapeutic outcomes.

Innovation Solution

A method that combines patient movement patterns with specific needle movement protocols to diagnose and treat myofascial trigger points, using a sequence of movement patterns to assess and treat target tissues, and adjust needle protocols to induce an LTR and maximize treatment efficiency while minimizing muscle damage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional TDN is performed with patient fixed and relaxed position without movement, then muscle damage during treatment is prevented or lessened, but the ability to induce Local Twitch Response (LTR) is reduced and treatment efficacy is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment efficacyVSAvoidmuscle damage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the static, fixed patient position into a dynamic state by introducing controlled patient movement patterns during needle insertion and treatment. The practitioner guides the patient through specific movements that activate target muscles, enabling LTR induction while maintaining needle contact with the trigger point. This dynamic approach resolves the contradiction by showing that controlled movement during treatment can achieve therapeutic goals without causing excessive muscle damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameters of treatment by introducing movement amplitude, velocity, and pattern variables. Instead of a fixed needle insertion, the system incorporates controlled patient movement parameters that optimize LTR induction. The needle remains in contact with the trigger point while the patient's movement creates dynamic tension and activation, changing the treatment from a static to a dynamic parameter set that improves efficacy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If repeated needle use is employed to induce LTR, then the Local Twitch Response can be achieved, but unnecessary pain and muscle damage occur

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveLTR induction successVSAvoidpain and muscle damage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by having the patient perform specific movement patterns before and during needle insertion to pre-activate the target muscle and position the trigger point optimally. This preliminary muscle activation makes LTR induction more efficient, reducing the number of needle manipulations needed and thereby decreasing pain and tissue damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates real-time feedback through the practitioner's tactile sensation of the needle contact and the patient's movement quality. The practitioner adjusts needle depth, angle, and patient movement parameters based on feedback from muscle response, allowing precise LTR induction with minimal needle manipulation and reduced tissue trauma.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If TDN targets myofascial trigger points without integrating patient movement patterns, then the treatment protocol is simpler, but therapeutic outcomes are suboptimal and range of motion improvement is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment protocol simplicityVSAvoidtherapeutic outcome
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges two previously separate treatment components: traditional needle insertion techniques and modern movement therapy. By combining needle contact with trigger points and controlled patient movement patterns, the system creates an integrated treatment protocol that maintains relative simplicity while dramatically improving therapeutic outcomes and range of motion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively induces an LTR, improving treatment efficacy for myofascial trigger points by integrating patient movement patterns with controlled needle protocols, enhancing the therapeutic effect and reducing muscle damage.

Implementation Method 1

The stimulation in many cases releases and inactivates the myofascial trigger point. This stimulation is also known to cause what is known as a Local Twitch Response ("LTR"). The LTR is an involuntary spinal cord reflex that causes a muscle to visibly contract.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpinal cord reflex:

Data Source

PatentUS10751249B2Trigger point dry needling in motion and method of use
Publication Date: 2020.08.25 JOHNSON ATHLETIC ADVANTAGE LLC
  • US10751249B2 patent drawing
  • US10751249B2 patent drawing
  • US10751249B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method is provided for a novel application of trigger point dry needling. A target tissue is identified based on the observation of a series of movement patterns performed by the patient. Once identified, a needle movement protocol is used to insert a needle into the target tissue to a myofascial trigger point during one or more movement patterns. The needle protocol is adjusted until a local twitch response is induced.