DSAR Prioritization via Metadata Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems are inadequate for efficiently processing and fulfilling data subject access requests within the required timelines, especially for large corporations with data stored across multiple platforms, due to the complexity of managing personal data across numerous data assets and processing activities.

Innovation Solution

A data subject access request processing and fulfillment system that adjusts prioritization levels based on metadata associated with the request, such as the type of request, location, and data processing conditions, to optimize resource allocation and processing time, using a graphical user interface to display the updated order and status of requests.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If data is stored across multiple platforms and locations in large corporations, then data storage capacity and accessibility are improved, but the complexity of managing personal data and fulfilling data subject access requests increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata storage capacityVSAvoidcomplexity of managing personal data
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the data management system into multiple components including data inventories, data assets, data processing activities, and a central processing system. Each component handles specific aspects of data management, allowing the system to scale across multiple platforms while maintaining manageable complexity through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a central processing system that acts as an intermediary between data subjects and the distributed data storage infrastructure. This intermediary receives access requests, processes them through metadata analysis, and coordinates fulfillment across multiple data platforms, thereby managing the complexity of cross-platform data access.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If traditional systems process data subject access requests without prioritization, then all requests are handled uniformly, but the time required to fulfill requests exceeds regulatory deadlines

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuniform request handlingVSAvoidtime to fulfill requests
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic prioritization where request priority levels are not fixed but adjusted in real-time based on metadata analysis. The system continuously evaluates factors such as data sensitivity, request type, and processing conditions to dynamically reorder the fulfillment queue, ensuring that urgent requests are processed first while maintaining flexibility in handling uniform requests.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of request priority from a static uniform value to a dynamic variable based on multiple metadata parameters. By analyzing metadata such as data classification, request urgency, and processing complexity, the system adjusts priority levels to optimize fulfillment time while maintaining fair and systematic handling of all requests.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If metadata analysis is used to adjust prioritization levels, then processing efficiency and compliance are improved, but the computational resources and processing time required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing efficiencyVSAvoidcomputational resources
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial metadata analysis by focusing on the most critical metadata fields relevant to prioritization decisions rather than analyzing all available metadata. This selective approach extracts only the essential information needed for priority adjustment, reducing computational overhead while maintaining effective request prioritization and compliance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Device complexity

If requests are processed in a fixed queue order, then system simplicity is maintained, but the ability to meet regulatory deadlines and respond to urgent requests is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidcompliance with regulatory deadlines
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the static fixed queue into a dynamic priority-based queue that automatically reorders requests based on real-time metadata analysis. This dynamic approach maintains system simplicity through automated processing rules while significantly improving reliability by ensuring that urgent and compliant requests are fulfilled within regulatory deadlines.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20220318817A1Data processing systems for fulfilling data subject access requests and related methods
Publication Date: 2022.10.06 ONETRUST LLC
  • US20220318817A1 patent drawing
  • US20220318817A1 patent drawing
  • US20220318817A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A Data Subject Access Request (DSAR) Prioritization System, according to various embodiments, is adapted for (1) executing the steps of receiving a data subject access request (DSAR); (2) at least partially in response to receiving the DSAR, obtaining metadata associated with at least one of the DSAR or a data subject associated with the DSAR; (3) using the metadata to determine whether a priority of the DSAR should be adjusted based at least in part on the obtained metadata; and (4) in response to determining that the priority of the DSAR should be adjusted based at least in part on the obtained metadata, adjusting the priority of the DSAR.