Multi-level DSL Debugger Automation

1Productivity

If manual identification and interaction with module debuggers is used for DSL tasks, then debugging can be performed, but the process becomes tedious and inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:

Improvedebugging efficiencyVSAvoidtime required for debugging

Core Design Contradiction:

ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service debugging by automatically identifying module debuggers and managing debugging interactions without requiring manual developer intervention. The processing logic autonomously performs breakpoint identification, debugger location, and data transmission between debuggers, allowing the system to debug itself rather than requiring external manual assistance for each debugging operation.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary processing logic that acts as a mediator between the DSL task execution and multiple module debuggers. This intermediary component automatically manages the complex interactions between different debuggers, translating and coordinating debugging operations across multiple programming languages and debugger interfaces, thereby eliminating the need for manual coordination.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If manual interaction with module debuggers is used, then debugging information can be obtained, but computing resources are used inefficiently

Engineering Contradiction:

Improvedebugging accuracyVSAvoidcomputing resource usage

Core Design Contradiction:

ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service debugging by automatically identifying module debuggers and managing debugging interactions without requiring manual developer intervention. The processing logic autonomously performs breakpoint identification, debugger location, and data transmission between debuggers, allowing the system to debug itself rather than requiring external manual assistance for each debugging operation.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary processing logic that acts as a mediator between the DSL task execution and multiple module debuggers. This intermediary component automatically manages the complex interactions between different debuggers, translating and coordinating debugging operations across multiple programming languages and debugger interfaces, thereby eliminating the need for manual coordination.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of operation

If manual input handling is used in debugging, then debugging operations can be performed, but errors may occur

Engineering Contradiction:

Improvedebugging operation simplicityVSAvoiddebugging error rate

Core Design Contradiction:

Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service debugging by automatically identifying module debuggers and managing debugging interactions without requiring manual developer intervention. The processing logic autonomously performs breakpoint identification, debugger location, and data transmission between debuggers, allowing the system to debug itself rather than requiring external manual assistance for each debugging operation.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary processing logic that acts as a mediator between the DSL task execution and multiple module debuggers. This intermediary component automatically manages the complex interactions between different debuggers, translating and coordinating debugging operations across multiple programming languages and debugger interfaces, thereby eliminating the need for manual coordination.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Productivity

If automated multi-level debugging is implemented, then debugging efficiency improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:

Improvedebugging efficiencyVSAvoiddebugging system complexity

Core Design Contradiction:

ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary processing logic that acts as a mediator between the DSL task execution and multiple module debuggers. This intermediary component automatically manages the complex interactions between different debuggers, translating and coordinating debugging operations across multiple programming languages and debugger interfaces, thereby eliminating the need for manual coordination.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The processing logic is designed with universal functionality to handle multiple programming languages and debugger types through a unified interface. It can identify breakpoints, locate appropriate debuggers, and manage data transmission across different debugging environments using a single multi-functional component, reducing the need for separate specialized tools for each language or debugger.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Multi-level DSL Debugger Automation

Solution Overview

Problem

Innovation Solution

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

Solution Approach 1:

Solution Approach 2:

2Reliability

Solution Approach 1:

Solution Approach 2:

3Ease of operation

Solution Approach 1:

Solution Approach 2:

4Productivity

Solution Approach 1:

Solution Approach 2:

Data Source

AI summary