DSL Vectoring Back Channel for FEXT Noise Mitigation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

DSL systems face challenges in mitigating downstream far-end crosstalk (FEXT) noise, which affects the reliability of high-bandwidth communications by degrading signal quality and reducing the number of bits that can be transmitted effectively over DSL lines.

Innovation Solution

A system and method are introduced to provide dedicated back channel communications by reserving specific bins for error sampling and using orthogonal pilot sequences to measure and transmit error samples, allowing for robust bit allocation and error detection, and incorporating MIMO pre-coding to compensate for FEXT, ensuring synchronized and aligned DMT symbols across vectoring-enabled CPEs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If DMT modulation is used to achieve high-bandwidth communication, then data transmission rate is improved, but downstream far-end crosstalk noise increases degrading signal quality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata transmission rateVSAvoidsignal quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by measuring FEXT noise characteristics during a training phase before actual data transmission begins. The system performs channel estimation and noise measurement in advance, then uses this pre-acquired information to configure error correction codes and signaling parameters that are specifically adapted to the measured channel conditions, thereby improving reliability without sacrificing transmission rate

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback by establishing a back channel that transmits measured FEXT noise samples and channel state information from the remote end back to the central office. This feedback loop enables the system to continuously monitor noise conditions and adapt error correction schemes, allowing the system to maintain high data rates while compensating for crosstalk interference through informed coding decisions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If error correction coding is added to mitigate FEXT noise, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by dynamically adjusting error correction code parameters based on measured FEXT noise levels. The system varies coding rates, block lengths, and other code parameters according to the actual channel conditions, allowing it to achieve high reliability in noisy conditions while using simpler or lower-rate codes when conditions permit, thus avoiding unnecessary complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the error correction function into modular components that can be independently configured and applied to different portions of the transmission. The system divides the back channel into separate signaling channels for different types of information (noise samples, channel estimates, control data) and applies appropriate error protection to each segment based on its importance and the measured noise characteristics

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Measurement precision

If reserved bins are allocated for back channel signaling, then error detection capability is improved, but data transmission capacity is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror detection accuracyVSAvoiddata transmission capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by allocating only a portion of the available frequency bins to back channel signaling rather than reserving excessive resources. The system determines the minimum necessary number of bins required for accurate FEXT measurement and error detection, allocating just enough resources to achieve the required measurement precision while leaving the remaining bins available for data transmission

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses preliminary action by performing FEXT noise measurement during designated training symbols before data transmission begins. This allows the system to gather necessary channel state information in advance using reserved signaling bins, then use this pre-acquired information to configure the data transmission parameters, effectively separating the measurement phase from the data transmission phase to minimize capacity loss

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS8817907B2Systems and methods for signaling for vectoring of DSL systems
Publication Date: 2014.08.26 IKANOS COMMUNICATIONS INC
  • US8817907B2 patent drawing
  • US8817907B2 patent drawing
  • US8817907B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The measurement of far-end crosstalk (FEXT) in a Digital Subscriber Line communications is instrumental in the ability of using a multiple input multiple output (MIMO) pre-coder to cancel FEXT. A reliable robust back channel for transmission of error is instrumental to provide error samples for the proper operation of a MIMO pre-coder. Bins can be dedicated to insure bandwidth from the customer premises equipment (CPE) to the central office (CO). By increasing the margin used in the bins, robustness can be added to this back channel between the CPE and CO.