Distributed Unit Scheduling for Inter-Cell Interference Mitigation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional cellular radio access networks (RANs) experience throughput degradation and increased inter-cell interference in border regions due to limited frequency reuse and computational capacity, especially in large deployment areas with high user density, leading to capped support channel resources and connected UEs.

Innovation Solution

A distributed unit (DU) system comprising multiple processing units (PUs) and radio units (RUs) is configured to determine protection zones (PZs) and signal zones (SZs) for each UE, allowing independent scheduling and resource allocation across RU groups, minimizing interference and optimizing resource usage through time slot division and RU grouping strategies.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If frequency reuse is limited to reduce interference, then inter-cell interference is reduced, but throughput degradation occurs in border regions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinter-cell interferenceVSAvoidUE throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the RUs into multiple RU groups (RUGs) that are further divided into subsets associated with different PUs. This segmentation enables independent scheduling of different RU groups, allowing frequency reuse across non-overlapping RUGs while preventing interference in border regions through coordinated resource allocation. The segmentation of RUGs into first and second subsets with different PU associations creates a structured approach to managing interference and throughput trade-offs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Area of stationary object

If the number of RUs is increased to serve larger deployment areas, then coverage area is expanded, but computational capacity of DU becomes insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment areaVSAvoidcomputational capacity requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the DU into multiple PUs, each responsible for scheduling specific subsets of RUGs. This segmentation distributes the computational load across multiple PUs rather than concentrating it in a single DU, enabling the system to manage a larger number of RUs and broader deployment areas without overwhelming any single computational entity. Each PU handles a subset of scheduling tasks independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a dimensional transformation by organizing RUs into hierarchical groups (RUGs and PU associations) rather than managing them as individual entities. This grouping structure adds an organizational dimension to resource management, allowing the system to scale efficiently by managing aggregates of RUs through PU-level coordination rather than handling each RU independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Productivity

If reuse is supported only for user data channels, then data communication is optimized, but support channel resources become capped

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser data throughputVSAvoidsupport channel resources
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies universality by enabling the same RU grouping and scheduling framework to serve multiple channel types including both user data channels and support channels (PUCCH, SRS). The RU subsets and PU associations are configured to handle different channel types uniformly, allowing support channels to benefit from frequency reuse and coordinated scheduling just like data channels, thereby expanding support channel resources without sacrificing data communication performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Quantity of substance

If multiple cells are deployed to serve large areas, then user density is increased, but throughput degradation occurs in border regions between cells

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser densityVSAvoidborder region interference
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the functionality of multiple cells into a single coordinated system by having multiple PUs manage overlapping RUG sets. The intersection of RUG Groups associated with different PUs creates a unified management approach that coordinates resource allocation across what would traditionally be separate cell borders, eliminating the harmful effects of inter-cell interference while maintaining high user density capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS20240292386A1Distributed mitigation of interference in radio access networks
Publication Date: 2024.08.29 OUTDOOR WIRELESS NETWORKS LLC
  • US20240292386A1 patent drawing
  • US20240292386A1 patent drawing
  • US20240292386A1 patent drawing

AI summary

One embodiment is directed to a system comprising a distributed unit comprising a plurality of processing units (PUs) and a plurality of radio units (RUs). Each PU is configured to: for each time slot included in a first subset of the time slots, independently perform scheduling for at least one shared channel for only those UEs for which the respective protection zone (PZ) span only RU groups (RUGs) included in a first one of a respective pair of RUG Groups associated with that PU, and, for each time slot included in a second subset of the time slots, independently perform scheduling for the at least one shared channel for only those UEs for which the respective PZs span only the RUGs included in a second one of the respective pair of RUG Groups associated with that PU. Other embodiments are directed to scheduling support channel resources.