Portable Combustion System with Dual Air Sources and Automated Ash Removal

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current portable combustion systems for vegetative waste and biomass incineration face challenges such as high transportation costs, cumbersome relocation, inadequate combustion air supply, lack of automated ash removal, and inefficient ignition and feeding mechanisms, leading to inefficient and hazardous operations.

Innovation Solution

A portable combustion system with a combustion chamber that receives air from both top and bottom, featuring a preheated second source of combustion air, an auger system for ash removal, and a camera for monitoring combustion, allowing for efficient and continuous operation without the need for supplemental fuels and minimizing manual handling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a portable combustion system is designed to be movable and repositionable, then ease of operation is improved, but device complexity increases due to transportation and assembly requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of relocationVSAvoidtransportation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The combustion system is divided into modular components including a combustion chamber assembly, support frame with wheels, and separate hopper sections that can be independently handled during transport and assembly, reducing the complexity of moving the entire system at once

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The support frame incorporates wheels and movable mounting mechanisms that allow the combustion chamber to be easily repositioned and adjusted at the job site, improving ease of operation while keeping the overall system design relatively simple

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If combustion air is supplied only from the top, then device complexity is reduced, but combustion efficiency deteriorates due to inadequate air supply to the lower portion of the combustion chamber

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecombustion efficiencyVSAvoidair supply system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Air supply is extended from a single top-down dimension to multiple dimensions by adding side air inlets and bottom air inlets to the combustion chamber, enabling three-dimensional air distribution that improves combustion efficiency throughout the entire chamber volume

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the combustion chamber are provided with air supply tailored to their specific needs: top air inlets for upper combustion zones, side air inlets for mid-section oxygenation, and bottom air inlets for lower combustion areas, optimizing combustion efficiency locally throughout the chamber

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Productivity

If ash removal is performed manually, then device complexity is reduced, but productivity deteriorates due to time-consuming and tedious ash removal operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveash removal efficiencyVSAvoidash removal system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The ash removal system is designed to be easily operated by the user through simple mechanical means such as a dump hopper or manual auger mechanism that requires minimal effort to activate, providing automated or semi-automated ash removal without adding significant system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of actively removing ash through complex mechanical means, the system inverts the approach by using a dump hopper or tilting mechanism that allows ash to passively discharge under gravity when the hopper is tipped, simplifying the ash removal process while improving productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

4Reliability

If supplemental fuels are used for ignition, then reliability of ignition is improved, but safety deteriorates due to potential hazardous situations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveignition reliabilityVSAvoidignition safety
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The ignition system replaces chemical supplemental fuels with an electrical or electronic ignition mechanism such as an electric heater element or spark generator that directly heats or ignites the waste material, maintaining reliable ignition while eliminating the safety hazards associated with storing and handling flammable liquids

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

An intermediary heating element or ignition device is introduced between the waste material and the need for supplemental fuel, providing a controlled and safe ignition source that mediates the transition from unburned to burning state without requiring hazardous chemicals

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system enables efficient and complete combustion of vegetative waste and biomass, simplifies transportation and operation, and extends the duration between servicing by automating ash removal and providing real-time combustion monitoring.

Implementation Method 1

a first source of combustion air supplied across a top of the combustion chamber to form an air curtain

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAir curtain:

Implementation Method 2

the second source of combustion air being preheated prior to the second source of combustion air passing through a plurality of openings formed in a perforated plate and entering into the combustion chamber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPreheating:

Implementation Method 3

designed to incinerate all types of vegetative waste, biomass, processed wood, chips, bark, ground wood, and other municipal solid waste

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Data Source

PatentUS10948183B2Portable combustion system with first and second air sources
Publication Date: 2021.03.16 TIGERCAT IND
  • US10948183B2 patent drawing
  • US10948183B2 patent drawing
  • US10948183B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A combustion/carbonizing system which comprises a base frame and a combustion chamber frame which is pivotably attached to the base frame. The combustion chamber frame defines an open top combustion chamber having a bottom perforated plate. A plenum is formed below the perforated plate for collecting biochar which passes therethrough. A first source of combustion air is supplied across the top of the combustion chamber while a second source of combustion air passes through the perforated plate into the combustion chamber. The combustion/carbonizing system is capable of operating in a continuous manner for combustion wood or waste material to the desired degree required by the end user for the purpose of reducing the volume of the material as well as the associated emissions while generating valuable char and boichar as an end product. For some applications, the combustion/carbonizing system may be operated to combust completely the wood or waste material.