Dual Multiple Aperture Devices for Dynamic X-ray Beam Shaping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current CT scanners lack the flexibility to control the spatial distribution of x-ray beams effectively, limiting dose reduction strategies and failing to account for patient size variability during imaging, which is essential for optimizing radiation beam intensity profiles.

Innovation Solution

The use of dual multiple aperture devices with predetermined designs and relative motion, optimized using mathematical and physical models, to generate a predetermined fluence pattern, allowing for dynamic modulation of the x-ray beam and improved beam shaping in x-ray imaging.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Shape

If static bow-tie filters are used to shape the x-ray beam, then beam intensity distribution is improved, but adaptability to patient size variability is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam intensity distributionVSAvoidadaptability to patient size variability
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by replacing static bow-tie filters with dynamically adjustable aperture devices that can change their transmission pattern in real-time. The aperture devices are controlled to adapt to different patient sizes and anatomical regions, allowing the beam intensity distribution to be optimized for each specific imaging scenario rather than using a fixed static filter design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements parameter changes by varying the transmission characteristics of the aperture devices based on patient parameters such as size, anatomy, and imaging region. The system adjusts aperture positions, shapes, and transmission levels dynamically to match the specific requirements of each patient, thereby resolving the contradiction between maintaining optimal beam shaping and adapting to patient variability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of energy

If tube current modulation is used to control exposure, then dose reduction is improved, but spatial distribution control is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveradiation doseVSAvoidspatial distribution control
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the x-ray beam into multiple discrete regions using independently controllable aperture devices. Each aperture can be individually adjusted to control the spatial distribution of radiation to different anatomical regions, providing fine-grained control over where radiation is delivered and at what intensity, thereby improving both dose reduction and spatial distribution control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces aperture devices as intermediary elements between the x-ray source and the patient. These intermediaries actively modulate the beam spatial distribution before it reaches the patient, providing precise control over radiation delivery patterns and enabling region-specific dose optimization that tube current modulation alone cannot achieve.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If dynamic fluence field modulation is implemented, then acquisition flexibility is improved, but device complexity is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveacquisition flexibilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements universality by designing aperture devices that can perform multiple functions: beam shaping, dose modulation, region-of-interest selection, and adaptive filtering. A single multi-functional aperture system replaces what would otherwise require multiple separate components, achieving high acquisition flexibility while managing device complexity through integrated design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables the generation of a wide range of fluence patterns, reducing radiation dose and improving image quality by dynamically adjusting the x-ray beam distribution based on patient size and position, thereby enhancing the flexibility and efficiency of CT scans.

Implementation Method 1

Each of the multiple aperture devices have a design and each of the multiple aperture devices are configured to have motion relative to others of the multiple aperture devices. The design and the motion of the multiple aperture devices is predetermined to generate a predetermined fluence pattern.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectX-ray absorption and attenuation: Absorption (EM radiation)

Data Source

PatentUS11724129B2Method for optimizing radiation beam intensity profile shape using dual multiple aperture devices
Publication Date: 2023.08.15 JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
  • US11724129B2 patent drawing
  • US11724129B2 patent drawing
  • US11724129B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention is directed to multiple aperture devices (MADs) for beam shaping in x-ray imaging. Two or more of these binary filters can be placed in an x-ray beam in series to permit a large number of x-ray fluence profiles. However, the relationship between particular MAD designs and the achievable fluence patterns is complex. The present invention includes mathematical and physical models that are used within an optimization framework to find optimal MAD designs. Specifically, given a set of target fluence patterns, the present invention finds, for example, a dual MAD design that is a “best fit” in generating the desired fluence patterns. This process provides a solution for both the design of MAD filters as well as the control actuation that is required (relative motion between MADs) that needs to be specified as part of the operation of a MAD-based fluence field modulation system.