Dual-Arm Robot Control via Single Grip for IED Disposal

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional unmanned ground vehicles (UGVs) and MRAPs face challenges in navigating cluttered environments and controlling robotic arms with precision, particularly in situations where obstacles restrict movement and access to work pieces, such as improvised explosive devices (IEDs).

Innovation Solution

A robot system comprising a macro robotic arm and a micro robotic arm, controlled through a single intuitive interface grip, allowing for seamless transition between control states to manage the movement of both arms and a UGV, enabling precise operation in cluttered spaces and overcoming mobility restrictions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a single control interface grip is used to control multiple robotic arms, then ease of operation is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control interface grip is designed to serve multiple functions by controlling both the macro robotic arm and micro robotic arm through the same interface. This allows a single device to perform multiple control tasks, improving ease of operation while managing complexity through functional integration rather than proliferation of separate controls

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The control system implements a nested hierarchy where the macro robotic arm operates at one level of control and the micro robotic arm operates at another level, with both nested within the same control interface grip. This nested structure allows intuitive control where broader movements control the macro arm and finer adjustments control the micro arm, resolving the contradiction between ease of operation and device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Manufacturing precision

If separate controls are used for each joint of the robotic arm, then manufacturing precision is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveprecisionVSAvoidease of operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple separate controls for each joint are merged into a single control interface grip. The grip integrates control of all robotic arm joints into one unified interface, maintaining precision through coordinated control of all joints while dramatically improving ease of operation by eliminating the need for operators to manage multiple separate controls

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Speed

If conventional UGVs are used in cluttered environments, then mobility is maintained, but navigation capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovemobilityVSAvoidnavigation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The robotic system is segmented into two distinct arms with different capabilities: a macro robotic arm for general positioning and navigation in cluttered environments, and a micro robotic arm for precise manipulation. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized for its specific function, maintaining mobility while improving navigation capability in complex environments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS9638497B2Improvised explosive device defeat system
Publication Date: 2017.05.02 HARRIS CORP
  • US9638497B2 patent drawing
  • US9638497B2 patent drawing
  • US9638497B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A robot system (50) includes a control system (101) having a control interface grip (102). The robot system includes a macro robotic arm (54) and a micro robotic arm (60). The robot system is arranged such that the macro robotic arm will respond, in a first control system state, to movement of the control interface grip. In particular, the macro robotic arm will move in a plurality of directions responsive to corresponding movement of the interface grip. The micro robotic arm will respond, in a second control system state, to movement of the control interface grip. In particular, the micro robotic arm will move in a plurality of directions responsive to corresponding movement of the interface grip.