Dual-Array Radar Angle Detection for Direct and Multipath Reflections

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Radar systems face challenges in accurately detecting direction-of-arrival (DoA) and direction-of-departure (DoD) angles in dynamic environments with direct-path and multipath reflections, leading to errors and resource saturation due to DoD-DoA mismatches, especially in bistatic conditions, which hinder effective object tracking and pose safety risks.

Innovation Solution

A radar system with a transmitter array forming a minimum redundancy array and a receiver array forming a sparse uniform linear array processes EM energy to generate a 2D data matrix, determining estimated angles, and identifies actual angles through a maximum likelihood criterion, enabling accurate angle detection without distinguishing between reflection conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a radar system uses a uniform linear array to reduce cost and complexity, then device complexity is reduced, but measurement precision deteriorates due to angular ambiguity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearray complexityVSAvoidangular resolution
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The array is divided into two distinct subarrays: a first subarray configured without angle ambiguity (e.g., non-uniform spacing) and a second subarray configured as a uniform linear array. This segmentation allows each subarray to specialize in different functions, resolving the contradiction between complexity and precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The problem transitions from a one-dimensional angle estimation problem to a two-dimensional problem by considering both DoA and DoD angles. The dual-subarray configuration enables the system to estimate angles in multiple dimensions, resolving the angular ambiguity that plagues single-array systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Measurement precision

If the radar system differentiates between direct-path and multipath reflection conditions, then measurement precision improves, but device complexity and computational cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveangle detection accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The radar system uses a universal angle detection method that works for both direct-path and multipath reflection conditions without requiring separate processing branches. The maximum likelihood criterion based on dual-subarray measurements provides a unified solution that automatically adapts to different reflection scenarios, eliminating the need for condition differentiation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the approach from classifying reflection types to directly estimating angles using the physical relationship between DoA and DoD. By parameterizing the problem in terms of angle estimates and their relationships rather than reflection types, the system achieves precision without the complexity of condition-based processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If a radar system uses MIMO with synthetic arrays to improve angular resolution, then measurement precision improves, but device complexity and computational cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveangular resolutionVSAvoidarray configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The physical array is segmented into two functional subarrays with different configurations. This segmentation creates a virtual extended array through the relationship between DoA and DoD estimates, achieving synthetic array benefits without the full complexity of traditional MIMO configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The first subarray acts as an intermediary that provides unambiguous angle estimates, which then serve as constraints for refining the estimates from the second subarray. This intermediary role enables the system to achieve high resolution without requiring a fully synthesized MIMO array.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for improved angular resolution and reduced computational cost, effectively detecting DoA and DoD angles in direct-path and multipath scenarios with a single snapshot, suitable for automotive applications.

Implementation Method 1

Radar systems use antennas to transmit and receive electromagnetic (EM) signals for detecting and tracking objects. A direct-path reflection occurs when an EM signal travels directly between a radar system and a target. A multipath reflection occurs when the EM signal encounters a reflective surface between the radar system and the target

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic radiation transmission and reflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentUS12392879B2Radar system to universally detect direction-of-arrival or direction-of-departure angles in direct-path and multipath reflection conditions
Publication Date: 2025.08.19 APTIV TECHNOLOGIES AG
  • US12392879B2 patent drawing
  • US12392879B2 patent drawing
  • US12392879B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This document describes a radar system to universally detect direct-of-arrival (DoA) and direction-of-departure (DoD) angles in direct-path and multipath reflection conditions. For example, a radar system includes a transmitter and receiver array with a first array forming a minimum redundancy array and a second array forming a sparse uniform linear array. A processor determines, using second-array measurements, estimated angles. The quantity of estimated angles is larger than the quantity of actual angles due to angular ambiguity of the second array. The processor then identifies multiple potential sets of actual angles from among the estimated angles and tests each set under a maximum likelihood criterion using first-array measurements. The DoA and DoD angles are identified as the respective set with a maximum utility function value. In this way, the processor determines actual angles with improved resolution and reduced cost without having to identify whether a direct-path or multipath reflection condition exists.