Dual-Axis Gate Ring Retainer for Automatic Object Entry and Exit

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing retaining devices cannot safely, conveniently, and economically receive and dispense an indefinite number of object types through moving contact on two distinct axes, as they typically require separate entry and exit mechanisms that are not efficiently managed.

Innovation Solution

A retaining device with a ring structure featuring a single or dual gate system that moves on two axes, utilizing a biasing mechanism to remain closed unless overcome by an object's force for entry or exit, allowing for safe and economical handling of various objects.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single gate system is used for both entry and exit, then device complexity is reduced, but it becomes difficult to manage separate axes for entry and exit

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegate system complexityVSAvoidaxis management
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The gate system is segmented into two independent gates: a first gate for entry on a first axis and a second gate for exit on a second axis. This segmentation allows each gate to be controlled independently by its own biasing mechanism, simplifying the overall system while enabling separate axis management for entry and exit operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention introduces a second axis for exit that is distinct from the first axis for entry. By operating in two different dimensional directions, the device can simultaneously manage entry and exit through separate gates without interference, resolving the conflict between simplicity and operational manageability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Ease of operation

If separate gates are used for entry and exit, then axis management is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaxis managementVSAvoidgate system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Both the first gate and second gate are integrated into a single ring structure. This merging of the two gates into one unified component allows them to share the same structural framework while maintaining independent operation through separate biasing mechanisms, thereby reducing overall device complexity while preserving separate axis management capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The ring structure serves multiple functions: it houses both the first gate for entry and the second gate for exit, and provides structural support for both gates. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate components, thereby reducing device complexity while enabling independent control of entry and exit axes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If the ring remains closed by bias, then safety is improved, but ease of opening for entry/exit requires overcoming bias force

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidgate opening
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The biasing mechanisms automatically return the first and second gates to their closed positions after objects pass through. This self-service feature maintains safety by keeping gates closed without requiring active control, while the gates can be easily opened when sufficient force is applied by incoming or outgoing objects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The biasing mechanisms provide a controlled resistance force that can be overcome by objects of appropriate size and force. The system dynamically adjusts between maintaining a closed state for safety and allowing opening when needed, changing the operational parameter of gate position based on applied force.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables the safe, convenient, and economical reception and dispensing of objects on two distinct axes, ensuring efficient operation and cost-effectiveness in manufacturing and use.

Implementation Method 1

a biasing mechanism urges each gate into a position so that the ring remains effectively closed

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Data Source

PatentUS9664333B1Retaining device
Publication Date: 2017.05.30 HUDSON THOMAS FLOYD
  • US9664333B1 patent drawing
  • US9664333B1 patent drawing
  • US9664333B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A ring serves as a retaining device for objects. A gate on the ring opens to receive objects that move on one specified axis of direction for entry and retainment. A gate on the ring opens to dispense a retained object that is moving on a separate specified axis from that on which it entered. Depending on embodiment, entry and exit are provided through a single dual axis gate or by two respective gates. Biasing mechanisms urge the gate(s) closed whereupon moving force of contact from an object to enter or exit overpowers the respective bias. Absent overriding directional force, the ring remains closed, retaining an object within. A provision to mount the ring to an anchor which exceeds by inertia the gate biases is included.