Dual-Axis LIDAR Scanning for Tilt-Compensated UAV Obstacle Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional LIDAR devices are expensive and heavy, making them unsuitable for small and medium-sized unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), which need reliable obstacle detection and evasive maneuver capabilities.

Innovation Solution

A dual-axis motion mechanism is implemented, comprising a spinning device and a tilting device, coupled with a single-line LIDAR module, allowing the LIDAR to adjust its scanning direction based on the UAV's orientation, ensuring consistent obstacle detection regardless of the vehicle's attitude, thereby reducing costs and complexity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional LIDAR devices are used for obstacle detection in UAVs, then detection reliability is improved, but device weight and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobstacle detection reliabilityVSAvoidLIDAR device weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The LIDAR system is segmented into two independent parts: a single-line laser emitter for obstacle detection and a separate motion mechanism (spinning device + tilting device) for beam direction control. This segmentation allows the use of a simple, lightweight laser source while achieving comprehensive scanning coverage through mechanical motion, resolving the contradiction between detection reliability and device weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If traditional LIDAR devices are used for obstacle detection in UAVs, then detection reliability is improved, but device cost increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobstacle detection reliabilityVSAvoiddevice cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The system separates the expensive multi-line laser array into a simple single-line laser emitter, and compensates for the reduced detection coverage through a mechanically segmented scanning approach using spinning and tilting devices. This segmentation dramatically reduces manufacturing cost while maintaining detection reliability through motion-based scanning coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the complex optical system (multiple laser lines) with a simpler mechanical system (spinning + tilting motion mechanism) to achieve the same functional outcome of comprehensive obstacle detection coverage, thereby reducing device cost while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Device complexity

If a single-line LIDAR is used without motion mechanism, then device complexity is reduced, but scanning coverage and detection capability are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveLIDAR system complexityVSAvoidscanning coverage
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces dynamic motion (spinning at high speed + tilting at controlled angles) to transform a static single-line laser into an effective scanning system. The dynamics of the motion mechanism enable the simple laser to cover multiple directions and achieve comprehensive scanning coverage, resolving the contradiction between low complexity and high adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adds dimensional movement to the single-line laser by implementing both horizontal spinning motion and vertical tilting motion. This two-dimensional motion capability transforms a one-dimensional laser beam into a three-dimensional scanning system, dramatically expanding detection coverage while keeping the laser source simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Device complexity

If the scanning element does not compensate for body tilt, then device complexity is reduced, but measurement precision deteriorates when UAV is not level

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetilt compensation system complexityVSAvoidobstacle detection precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback control by using orientation sensors to detect the UAV's body tilt angle and automatically adjusting the tilting device to compensate for the tilt. This feedback mechanism ensures that the laser scanning plane remains horizontal regardless of the UAV's attitude, maintaining measurement precision without requiring complex hardware modifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes the tilting angle parameter based on the detected body tilt angle. When the UAV tilts, the tilting device adjusts its angle to counteract the tilt, keeping the scanning plane level. This parameter adjustment approach maintains detection precision while avoiding the need for complex mechanical stabilization systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enables cost-effective, all-weather, high-precision obstacle detection and terrain scanning for smaller UAVs, allowing them to autonomously navigate and avoid obstacles, similar to more expensive multi-line LIDAR systems.

Implementation Method 1

The orientation sensor can be one or more of a rotary encoder, or a Hall effect sensor.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHall effect: Hall Effect

Data Source

PatentUS11188079B2Laser radar scanning and positioning mechanisms for UAVs and other objects, and associated systems and methods
Publication Date: 2021.11.30 SZ DJI TECH CO LTD
  • US11188079B2 patent drawing
  • US11188079B2 patent drawing
  • US11188079B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Example embodiments include a motion mechanism that can be coupled between the main body of an unmanned movable object and the optoelectronic scanning module. The motion mechanism can include, e.g., a spinning device and a tilting device. The spinning device can be operable to rotate the scanning module relative to the main body about a spin axis. The tilting device can be operable, e.g., in response to a tilt angle input, to rotate the scanning module about an additional axis that is transverse to the spin axis. Further example embodiments include an orientation sensor installed on the main body of the unmanned movable object. Some embodiments also provide a controller that is configured to receive an orientation signal from the orientation sensor and, based at least in part on the orientation signal, determine a tilt value for the tilt angle input for the tilting device in the motion mechanism.