Dual-Backplane Structure for Server Signal Routing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Single backplanes in server or storage systems with dual control modules are inadequate for handling a large number of signal lines, leading to limited connector placement, increased circuit board layers, and cost inefficiencies, and cannot be easily expanded without lengthening the chassis, which conflicts with standard rack sizes.

Innovation Solution

A dual-backplane structure is introduced, where a first backplane connects control modules and a second backplane connects hard disk modules, with connectors on the main board slightly retracted to avoid interference and allow for wider applicability within standard rack dimensions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single backplane is used to connect all signal lines, then the structure is simple, but the number of connectors is limited and cannot meet the interconnection requirements when there are too many signal lines

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebackplane structureVSAvoidconnector capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the single backplane into two separate backplanes: a first backplane for connecting control modules and a second backplane for connecting hard disk modules. This segmentation allows each backplane to have dedicated connectors for specific functions, thereby increasing the overall connector capacity and meeting the interconnection requirements without excessive complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If more connectors are placed on the main board and backplane to accommodate more signal lines, then the connector capacity increases, but the connectors interfere with each other and the hard disk connector

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnector capacityVSAvoidconnector interference
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the backplane into two separate backplanes with dedicated connector areas, the patent eliminates connector interference. The first backplane contains connectors for control modules while the second backplane contains connectors for hard disk modules, ensuring that connectors do not overlap or interfere with each other

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes the vertical dimension by stacking the first and second backplanes at different heights. The first backplane is positioned above the second backplane, allowing connectors on both backplanes to be arranged in different vertical planes, thereby avoiding horizontal interference while maximizing connector capacity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Productivity

If the number of circuit board layers is increased to increase signal fan-out area, then the signal routing capacity increases, but the circuit board cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal fan-out capacityVSAvoidcircuit board cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the signal routing function across two separate backplanes, allowing each backplane to have optimized signal paths for its specific function. This reduces the need for excessive circuit board layers on a single backplane, as the signal fan-out is distributed across multiple boards rather than concentrated on one thick multi-layer board

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent moves signal routing from a horizontal plane to a vertical stack of backplanes. By utilizing the vertical dimension and stacking backplanes, the system achieves increased signal fan-out capacity without requiring additional circuit board layers, thereby controlling manufacturing costs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Adaptability or versatility

If cables are used to connect control modules, then the connector capacity and signal routing flexibility increase, but the chassis length must be increased to accommodate the cables

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal routing flexibilityVSAvoidchassis length
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLength of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the connection functions of control modules and hard disk modules onto integrated backplane structures. The first and second backplanes provide direct rigid connections through their respective connectors, eliminating the need for separate cables and reducing the overall chassis length while maintaining routing flexibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS11404810B2Dual-backplane structure and electronic device using same
Publication Date: 2022.08.02 CELESTICA TECH CONSULTANCY SHANGHAI
  • US11404810B2 patent drawing
  • US11404810B2 patent drawing
  • US11404810B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides a dual-backplane structure and electronic device using the same. The dual-backplane structure includes: a first backplane having an opening, and the front side of the first backplane includes at least one connector connected with a connector of the second assembly surface on a main board of a control module; a second backplane disposed on the back of the first backplane, the front side of the second backplane includes a connector connected with a connector of the first assembly surface on a main board of a control module; the back side of the second backplane includes a plurality of hard disk connectors for connecting with the hard disk module. At least one connector on the front side of the second backplane is connected with the connector corresponding to the first assembly surface on the main board through the opening of the first backplane.