Dual-Balance Payment Device with Segmented Fund Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing payment devices lack the capability to actively engage cardholders with multiple types of payment recipients, such as charitable and non-charitable entities, and fail to ensure that funds intended for charitable donations are actually used for such purposes.

Innovation Solution

A dual-balance payment device with a processor that restricts payment transactions, allowing a portion of funds to be used only for user-selected charitable entities until a separate portion designated for non-charitable entities is depleted, thereby incentivizing active participation and ensuring charitable donations are made.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a single pre-funded payment device is used for multiple payment types, then device simplicity and ease of operation are improved, but the ability to restrict and control funds for specific purposes (charitable donations) deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidreliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the payment device into two separate application balances: a first application balance restricted for charitable donations to user-selected entities, and a second application balance for general payments. This segmentation allows the device to maintain operational simplicity while reliably controlling funds for specific purposes through distinct balance compartments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If funds are made freely available for any payment transaction, then ease of operation and versatility are improved, but the assurance that charitable donation funds are actually used for charitable purposes deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveadaptabilityVSAvoidreliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The payment device separates funds into two distinct application balances with different usage restrictions. The first application balance is exclusively for charitable donations to user-selected entities, while the second application balance allows general payments. This segmentation ensures charitable funds are reliably used for their intended purpose while maintaining overall device versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different quality characteristics to different portions of the payment device's functionality. The first application balance has the quality attribute of being restricted to charitable entities only, while the second application balance has the quality attribute of allowing any payment recipient. This local differentiation of quality ensures reliable fund allocation while maintaining adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If a discretionary portion of pre-paid funds is locked until charitable transactions are performed, then reliability of charitable donation usage is improved, but device complexity and difficulty of operation increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereliabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements segmentation by creating two separate application balances within the payment device, each with distinct access rules. The first application balance is locked for charitable purposes only, while the second remains accessible for general use. This segmentation achieves reliable fund control without requiring complex external monitoring systems, as the restriction is built into the device's internal architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The payment device performs self-service by automatically enforcing the restriction rules through its internal processor and memory. The processor is configured to prevent access to the second application balance until the first application balance is depleted, eliminating the need for external oversight or complex user management of fund restrictions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Reliability

If separate payment devices are used for charitable and non-charitable transactions, then fund control reliability is improved, but device simplicity and ease of operation deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereliabilityVSAvoidease of operation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges two separate payment functions into a single portable payment device. By combining the first application balance (restricted for charitable donations) and the second application balance (for general payments) into one device with a unified interface, the patent achieves both reliable fund control and ease of operation, eliminating the need for users to manage multiple separate devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The payment device achieves multi-functionality by incorporating two distinct application balances within a single device. The first application balance provides universal access for charitable donations to any user-selected entity, while the second application balance provides universal access for general payments. This universality allows the device to serve multiple purposes reliably while maintaining operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS10825019B2Apparatus and method for creation of multiple configurable payment mechanisms within a single pre-funded electronic payment device
Publication Date: 2020.11.03 ITS GREAT BEING YOUNG LLC
  • US10825019B2 patent drawing
  • US10825019B2 patent drawing
  • US10825019B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Apparatus and methods for creation of multiple configurable payment mechanisms within a single pre-funded electronic payment device are provided herein. An example payment device includes a body portion, a memory associated with the body portion and containing a first stored value application having a first application balance and a second stored value application having a second application balance, and a processor associated with the body portion and coupled to the memory. The processor can perform a load transaction in an amount equal to the first application balance, and restrict any payment transaction carried out via the first stored value application to a payment transaction wherein the recipient consists of user-selected entities. The processor can also perform a load transaction in an amount equal to the second application balance, and preclude performance of payment transactions prior to depletion of the first application balance.