Dual-Band Phased Array Subarrays for Grating Lobe Mitigation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Phased array antennas face challenges in achieving wide angular scanning without grating lobes, particularly in dual-band operations, where existing methods either reduce scanning area, increase costs, or compromise radar performance.

Innovation Solution

A dual-band phased array antenna design with independently steerable planar subarrays having different boresight normal vectors, arranged on a regular or irregular polyhedral surface, ensuring radiating elements are compatible with the λ/2 condition for the lower band and suppressing grating lobes in the upper band.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If the distance between radiating elements is increased to reduce the number of elements, then cost is reduced, but grating lobes appear in the radiation pattern

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of radiating elementsVSAvoidgrating lobes
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The antenna array is divided into multiple subarrays, each with its own phase shifters and beamforming capabilities. This segmentation allows independent control of each subarray's radiation pattern, enabling the system to maintain element spacing larger than λ/2 while suppressing grating lobes through coordinated subarray beamforming.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from conventional 2D planar subarray arrangements to 3D tetrahedral subarray configurations. This dimensional change provides additional spatial degrees of freedom for beamforming, enabling more effective grating lobe suppression while maintaining reduced element density.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Object-generated harmful factors

If the distance between radiating elements is decreased to satisfy the λ/2 condition, then grating lobes are suppressed, but the number of elements and associated TRMs increases, raising cost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrating lobe suppressionVSAvoidnumber of radiating elements and TRMs
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the array into independently controllable subarrays, the patent achieves grating lobe suppression through coordinated beamforming rather than relying solely on dense element spacing. Each subarray can be optimized with larger element spacing while the collective subarray arrangement maintains overall pattern control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the geometric parameters of the subarray configuration from conventional 2D planar to 3D tetrahedral arrangements. This parameter change enables more efficient spatial utilization and grating lobe control with fewer total elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Object-generated harmful factors

If the operation frequency is lowered to avoid grating lobes, then grating lobe issues are reduced, but antenna beam width increases and directivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrating lobe reductionVSAvoidangular resolution
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic beamforming control across multiple subarrays, allowing the system to adaptively adjust beam patterns and suppress grating lobes through electronic control rather than relying on fixed geometric constraints that would limit angular resolution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

By changing the operational parameters of each subarray's beamforming weights and phases, the system can maintain high directivity and angular resolution while suppressing grating lobes, avoiding the need to lower the operating frequency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If separate antennas are used for lower and upper bands, then each antenna can be optimized for its band, but system complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveband-specific optimizationVSAvoidnumber of antennas
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent designs a universal dual-band antenna system where the same physical array structure and subarray configuration serve both lower and upper frequency bands. The multi-functional subarray architecture enables single-polarization operation across both bands without requiring separate antenna systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs periodic switching and beamforming across subarrays to handle different frequency bands, allowing the same hardware to be time-multiplexed or frequency-multiplexed for dual-band operation, reducing the need for separate dedicated antennas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentEP3109939B1Dual-band phased array antenna with built-in grating lobe mitigation
Publication Date: 2024.01.03 HENSOLDT SENSORS GMBH
  • EP3109939B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3109939B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP3109939B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

Dual-Band phased array antenna with built-in grating lobe mitigation comprising: - an array of radiating elements (110) capable of working at both bands and arranged at distances small enough, avoiding grating lobes with respect to the lower band within the desired field of view, - whereas the radiating elements are arranged in planar subarrays (100) which can be steered independently from each other, and - each of the subarrays (100) has a different boresight normal vector, so that grating lobes in the upper band being mitigated.