Dual Battery Control Using Driver Habits for EV Range Extension

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The fixedly mounted high-voltage battery in electric vehicles may not be sufficient for extended driving distances, necessitating an alternative solution to enhance battery efficiency and usability.

Innovation Solution

A dual battery system is introduced, comprising a first high-voltage battery fixedly mounted in the vehicle and a second high-voltage battery that can be added or detached, with a controller determining use plans based on driver habits and driving situations to optimize energy efficiency through conditioning control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Length of moving object

If a single fixedly mounted high-voltage battery is used in the vehicle, then the battery system structure is simple and reliable, but the driving distance is insufficient and battery capacity cannot be extended

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriving distanceVSAvoidbattery system structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The battery system is divided into a first high-voltage battery fixedly mounted in the vehicle and a second high-voltage battery that can be added or detached. This segmentation allows the system to provide extended driving distance when the second battery is attached, while maintaining structural simplicity when only the first battery is used.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The battery system transitions from a static single-battery configuration to a dynamic dual-battery configuration. The controller determines whether to use the first battery alone or both batteries together based on driving situations, making the system adaptable to different driving distance requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Duration of action of moving object

If a dual battery system is added to extend driving distance, then battery capacity and driving distance are improved, but the system complexity and control difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebattery operating timeVSAvoidbattery control system
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller performs preliminary determination of battery use plans based on predicted driving situations before actual battery operation. Conditioning control is executed in advance to prepare the second battery for optimal performance, reducing the complexity of real-time control decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The controller continuously monitors driving situations and battery states, using feedback to dynamically adjust battery usage strategies. This feedback mechanism simplifies control by automatically adapting to changing conditions rather than requiring complex pre-programmed control sequences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Use of energy by moving object

If the second high-voltage battery is used without conditioning control, then the system is simpler to operate, but energy efficiency is reduced and battery life is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy efficiencyVSAvoidbattery operation simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The battery system performs self-conditioning where the first battery conditions the second battery and vice versa, without requiring external intervention or complex user operations. This automatic conditioning maintains energy efficiency and battery life while keeping the system simple to operate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Conditioning control is executed in advance before the second battery is put into service. This preliminary conditioning optimizes battery performance and extends battery life without requiring complex real-time control during actual battery operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Reliability

If individual conditioning control is applied to each battery based on use plans, then battery life and energy efficiency are improved, but the control complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebattery lifeVSAvoidconditioning control system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller adjusts conditioning parameters such as temperature, charge current, and voltage based on predicted driving situations and battery states. These parameter changes optimize battery life and energy efficiency while maintaining manageable control complexity through systematic parameter management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250346153A1Method for controlling dual batteries and a vehicle controlling dual batteries by the same
Publication Date: 2025.11.13 HYUNDAI MOTOR CO LTD
  • US20250346153A1 patent drawing
  • US20250346153A1 patent drawing
  • US20250346153A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A controlling method of a dual battery system for controlling a first battery and a second battery to supply power to a wheel driving motor in a vehicle includes: obtaining driving habit data of a driver for a discharging power of the driving motor or a charging power of the driving motor for one or more driving situations; determining at least one or more driving sections based on the one or more driving situations with respect to an expected driving route; determining an expected power based on the driving habit data with respect to each of the at least one or more driving sections; determining use plans of the first battery and the second battery based on an expected power corresponding to each of the at least one or more driving sections; and executing discharging or charging of the first battery and the second battery according to the use plans.