Dual Battery Pack Switching for Longer Runtime Engine Replacements

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Gas engines in outdoor power equipment produce emissions and have limited configurability, while battery-powered replacements suffer from lower power density and shorter runtime compared to gasoline engines.

Innovation Solution

A gas engine replacement device with dual battery packs and a power switching network controlled by an electronic processor, which switches between battery packs based on state of charge to extend runtime.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-generated harmful factors

If battery packs are used to replace gas engines, then emissions are eliminated and adaptability is improved, but runtime is reduced due to lower power density of battery chemistry

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveemissionsVSAvoidruntime
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The battery power system is segmented into multiple battery packs (first battery pack and second battery pack) that can be independently managed. Each battery pack has its own receptacle and can be selectively connected to the power switching network, allowing the system to divide the total energy storage across multiple units to extend operational duration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The electronic processor monitors the state of charge of battery packs in advance and proactively switches between packs before complete depletion occurs. The system determines when to connect or disconnect battery packs based on predetermined thresholds, ensuring continuous operation without interruption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Duration of action of moving object

If multiple battery packs are added to extend runtime, then duration of action is improved, but device complexity increases due to additional switching network and control logic

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveruntimeVSAvoidpower switching network complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The power switching network serves multiple functions: it connects battery packs to the motor, monitors state of charge, manages charge/discharge pathways, and controls the switching between battery packs. This multi-functional approach consolidates what could be separate complex subsystems into a single integrated control mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The electronic processor automatically monitors battery state of charge levels and autonomously decides when to switch between battery packs without user intervention. The system self-manages the complexity of coordinating multiple battery packs, eliminating the need for manual switching or complex user interface controls.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Duration of action of moving object

If battery packs are sequentially switched based on state of charge, then runtime is extended, but loss of time occurs during switching transitions

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveruntimeVSAvoidswitching transition time
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of moving objectVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The electronic processor continuously monitors the state of charge of the active battery pack and determines when switching is needed before complete depletion occurs. By proactively managing battery pack transitions based on predetermined thresholds, the system minimizes interruption time and ensures seamless power delivery to the motor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The power switching network is designed to maintain continuous power flow to the motor during battery pack transitions. The system ensures that the second battery pack is ready to immediately take over when the first battery pack reaches low charge, eliminating gaps in useful action and maintaining uninterrupted operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS12549025B2Battery configuration for gas engine replacement device
Publication Date: 2026.02.10 MILWAUKEE ELECTRIC TOOL CORP
  • US12549025B2 patent drawing
  • US12549025B2 patent drawing
  • US12549025B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Battery configuration for gas engine replacement device. One embodiment provides a gas engine replacement device (10) including a housing (14) and a first battery pack (50) and a second battery pack (50) connected to the housing (14). The gas engine replacement device (10) also includes a motor (36) within the housing (14) and a power switching network (310) coupled to the motor (36), the first battery pack (50), and the second battery pack (50) and configured to drive the motor (36). The gas engine replacement device (10) further includes an electronic processor (302) coupled to the power switching network (310) and configured to sequentially discharge the first battery pack (50) and the second battery pack (50) to the power switching network (310) to drive the motor (36).