Staggered Dual-Beam Antenna Array for Beam Isolation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing dual-beam antennas have high costs due to the large number of radiating elements, suffer from low radiation efficiency due to tight coupling, and experience severe gain loss and high power consumption.

Innovation Solution

The design includes a radiation array group with staggered radiating elements in different rows and increased distance between neighboring elements, reducing the number of radiating elements and improving radiation efficiency, while also using a power divider to connect the arrays and enhance beam isolation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If radiating elements are tightly coupled to reduce antenna size, then device complexity is reduced, but radiation efficiency deteriorates and gain loss increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveantenna sizeVSAvoidradiation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The radiating elements are divided into multiple rows with staggered arrangements. Each row contains elements positioned at different locations, creating segmented groups that reduce mutual coupling effects while maintaining a compact overall antenna structure. This segmentation allows each element to radiate more effectively without being overly influenced by adjacent elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from a single-row or simple grid arrangement to a multi-row staggered configuration. By adding the row dimension and staggering elements within rows, the design creates three-dimensional spatial separation that reduces coupling in the horizontal plane while maintaining vertical compactness. This dimensional approach allows tighter overall packaging without sacrificing individual element performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Device complexity

If radiating elements are shared between beams to reduce element count, then device complexity is reduced, but beam isolation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of radiating elementsVSAvoidbeam isolation
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Radiating elements are segmented into different rows that can be selectively activated for different beams. Instead of all elements being tightly coupled and shared equally, the staggered row structure allows certain rows to be assigned to specific beams, reducing interference between beams while still using a reduced total element count compared to fully independent beam structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables dynamic control of which radiating elements are active for which beam. Through electronic switching and phased array techniques, different combinations of staggered elements can be activated to form different beam patterns, providing flexible beam isolation without requiring physical separation of all elements dedicated to each beam.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Device complexity

If phase difference is fixed at ±90 degrees in Butler matrix to simplify design, then device complexity is reduced, but beam pointing accuracy deteriorates across broadband range

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvephase control complexityVSAvoidbeam pointing direction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the fixed ±90 degree phase shifting of Butler matrices with dynamic, electronically controllable phase shifters that can adjust phase differences adaptively. This allows the phase relationship between elements to be optimized for different frequencies and beam directions in real-time, maintaining accurate beam pointing across a broadband range while still using a manageable control structure through digital signal processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of being constrained to fixed phase values, the system allows phase parameters to be changed dynamically based on operating conditions. The staggered element geometry combined with variable phase control enables the system to compensate for frequency-dependent phase variations, maintaining beam accuracy across bandwidth while keeping the overall control architecture relatively simple through algorithmic phase adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20240258711A1Radiation array group, radiation array and dual-beam antenna
Publication Date: 2024.08.01 PROSE TECH CO LTD
  • US20240258711A1 patent drawing
  • US20240258711A1 patent drawing
  • US20240258711A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A radiation array group for a dual-beam antenna includes a first radiation array and a second radiation array. The first radiation array is configured to form a first beam. The second radiation array is configured to form a second beam. Either one of the first radiation array and the second radiation array includes at least two radiating element rows. Each radiating element row of the at least two radiating element rows includes two radiating elements. The at least two radiating element rows are not always aligned with each other.