Dual-Beam Ion Alignment Using CPB Lens Feedback Imaging

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Dual-beam instruments, such as those using ion and electron beams, face performance issues due to beam splitting caused by charged-particle-beam (CPB) lenses, leading to misalignment and requiring manual, inaccurate adjustments, which are time-consuming and can damage samples.

Innovation Solution

An automated method using image analysis techniques to quantify beam splitting and optimize the setting of CPB lenses in electron-beam instruments, reducing misalignment by acquiring images with varying lens settings and applying Fourier-transform operations to determine the optimal lens configuration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual adjustment of CPB lenses is performed to correct beam splitting, then beam alignment can be corrected, but the process is time-consuming and can damage samples

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam alignment accuracyVSAvoidsetup time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs automated beam alignment by acquiring images, analyzing beam splitting through FFT operations, and adjusting CPB lens settings without requiring manual intervention. The instrument self-corrects the beam alignment issue that would otherwise require time-consuming manual adjustment by an operator.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical adjustment of CPB lenses with an automated control system that uses image analysis and computational algorithms (FFT operations) to determine optimal lens settings. This substitution eliminates the need for physical manual manipulation and replaces it with automated electronic control based on image data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If manual adjustment of CPB lenses is performed to correct beam splitting, then beam alignment can be corrected, but the adjustments are inaccurate and can damage samples

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam alignment accuracyVSAvoidsample damage
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The automated system objectively measures beam splitting through image acquisition and FFT analysis, eliminating subjective human judgment errors. The system self-determines the precise lens settings needed for alignment, ensuring accurate correction without the inaccuracy and potential sample damage associated with manual adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system acquires images showing beam positions, analyzes them through FFT operations to quantify beam splitting, and uses this feedback information to determine the optimal CPB lens settings. This closed-loop feedback mechanism ensures accurate alignment by continuously monitoring beam positions and adjusting settings based on measured deviations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If automated image processing is applied to quantify beam splitting, then alignment accuracy is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealignment measurement accuracyVSAvoidinstrument complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex manual alignment procedures with automated image processing and computational algorithms. The FFT-based analysis system substitutes for the complexity of manual visual assessment and adjustment, providing more accurate measurements through computational methods while automating the entire alignment process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach improves the accuracy and efficiency of dual-beam instrument operations by automatically adjusting CPB lenses, reducing setup time and minimizing beam splitting, thereby enhancing imaging and characterization capabilities.

Implementation Method 1

a charged-particle-beam (CPB) lens having an adjustable setting controlling a magnetic force applied to the first and second sub-beams

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic force: Lorentz Force

Implementation Method 2

an ion-beam instrument of the dual-beam instrument is configured to generate an ion beam, the ion beam including first and second sub-beams

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIon beam: Ion Beam

Data Source

PatentUS12154757B2Automated ion-beam alignment for dual-beam instrument
Publication Date: 2024.11.26 FEI CO
  • US12154757B2 patent drawing
  • US12154757B2 patent drawing
  • US12154757B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein are scientific instrument support systems, as well as related methods, apparatus, computing devices, and computer-readable media. For example, some embodiments provide a scientific instrument comprising an ion-beam instrument configured to generate an ion beam including first and second sub-beams; an electron-beam instrument including a charged-particle-beam (CPB) lens having an adjustable setting controlling a magnetic force applied to the first and second sub-beams; and a computing device. The computing device is configured to: acquire an image by causing the ion-beam instrument to scan the ion beam across a sample using a selected setting of the CPB lens of the electron-beam instrument, apply automated image processing to the image to quantify an amount of spatial misalignment of the first and second sub-beams at the sample, and control the CPB lens of the electron-beam instrument to a setting based on the amount of spatial misalignment within the image.