Dual-Blade Agricultural Grinder with Floating Blade Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing agricultural grinders lack versatility in processing raw materials to specific particle sizes and safety features, making it difficult for users to efficiently process and repurpose agricultural materials like plants with varying compositions.

Innovation Solution

A dual-blade agricultural grinder system with a static and floating blade mechanism, particle screens, and a user-friendly graphical interface, allowing for adjustable cutting direction, speed, and power control, ensuring safe operation and efficient processing of raw materials to desired particle sizes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single-blade cutting mechanism is used, then the device complexity is reduced, but the manufacturing precision and versatility of particle size control deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting mechanism structureVSAvoidparticle size control
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The cutting mechanism is divided into two independent blades: a stationary blade and a floating blade. Each blade can be independently adjusted and optimized for specific cutting tasks, enabling precise control over particle size while maintaining manageable device complexity through modular design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The floating blade is designed to move dynamically in response to material feed variations, while the stationary blade provides fixed reference positioning. This dynamic-static combination allows the system to adapt to different materials and achieve consistent particle size control without increasing overall structural complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple particle screens with different mesh sizes are provided, then the adaptability for different particle sizes is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle size rangeVSAvoidscreen selection mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The grinder is designed with a universal cutting chamber that can accommodate multiple particle screens of different mesh sizes. The stationary blade and floating blade configuration works effectively with various screen types, allowing one machine to perform multiple particle size specifications without requiring complex automated screen selection mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple particle screens are stored in a nested or stacked arrangement within the housing, with each screen capable of being individually installed and removed. This nesting approach minimizes space requirements and allows users to select different screens based on desired particle size, maintaining simplicity while enhancing versatility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Ease of operation

If the cutting mechanism is exposed for easy access, then the ease of operation is improved, but the safety deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblade accessVSAvoiduser safety
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The cutting chamber is designed as a removable or easily detachable unit from the main housing. Users can access the blades by removing the entire cutting chamber assembly rather than reaching into an exposed mechanism, thereby maintaining safety while preserving ease of operation for blade maintenance and screen changes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

A safety interlock mechanism or protective guard system serves as an intermediary between the user and the moving blades. This intermediary component automatically engages when the cutting chamber is properly installed, preventing direct access to blades during operation while allowing easy access during maintenance when the chamber is removed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11724263B2Dual-blade agricultural grinder
Publication Date: 2023.08.15 SESH TECHNOLOGIES MANUFACTURING INC
  • US11724263B2 patent drawing
  • US11724263B2 patent drawing
  • US11724263B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for a dual-blade agricultural grinder are disclosed. A dual blade grinder comprises a casing, a hopper, a cutting mechanism, a chute, and a display. The grinder is configured to cut a plant to a desired particle size. The casing is configured to provide rigid structural support for components of the grinder and provide a safety barrier between the user and the cutting mechanism. The hopper is configured to store and distribute a plant to the cutting mechanism. The cutting mechanism comprises a static blade with one or more serrated edges and one or more plain edges, a floating curved blade, and a particle screen. The display is configured to accept input from a user operating the grinder, and to control operational settings of the grinder. The grinder and its components may be comprised of a food-grade quality steel configured to resist bacterial growth.