Dual Booster Ultrasonic Resonator Mounting Structure

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing ultrasonic processing devices face challenges in effectively transmitting and managing bending forces and vibration isolation, often requiring large spaces and complex structural setups.

Innovation Solution

The use of two boosters in series, with a pipe section mount that provides dual contact points for the ultrasonic resonator, optimizing flexural rigidity and vibration isolation by positioning contact surfaces at nodal points and utilizing a press fit connection for robust fixation across a wide temperature range.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single contact point mount is used for the ultrasonic resonator, then the device complexity is reduced, but the ability to transmit bending forces and retaining forces is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemounting structure complexityVSAvoidtransmission of bending forces
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The mounting structure is segmented into two separate contact points instead of a single contact point, allowing each contact point to independently support and transmit forces. This segmentation enables better distribution of bending forces and retaining forces across multiple locations on the ultrasonic resonator.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Object-affected harmful factors

If O-rings are used for vibration isolation, then vibration isolation performance is improved, but the radial and axial stiffness is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevibration isolationVSAvoidradial and axial stiffness
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

Different regions of the mounting structure have different properties: the contact points provide high stiffness for force transmission, while the mount body provides vibration isolation. This local differentiation allows the structure to simultaneously achieve both vibration isolation and adequate stiffness without requiring soft materials like O-rings throughout the entire structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Object-affected harmful factors

If Z-shaped mounts are used for vibration isolation, then vibration isolation performance is improved, but the space requirement and structural complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevibration isolationVSAvoidmounting structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The vibration isolation function is extracted as a separate feature of the mount body, while the force transmission function is handled by the simplified two-contact-point structure. This separation allows achieving vibration isolation without requiring complex Z-shaped configurations, thereby reducing overall structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Volume of moving object

If the ultrasonic resonator is supported on one side in vertical orientation, then the device space is reduced, but the transmission of bending forces is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice spaceVSAvoidtransmission of bending forces
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

Even in single-sided support configuration, the support is segmented into two distinct contact points on the ultrasonic resonator. This segmentation allows the single support location to effectively transmit bending forces by distributing the load across two contact points on the resonator body, maintaining force transmission capability while saving device space.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration enhances the transmission of retaining and bending forces while minimizing space requirements and ensuring high vibration isolation, allowing for precise positioning and efficient ultrasonic processing within a broad temperature range.

Implementation Method 1

The pipe section contacts the two boosters in the region of the nodal points. In this way, optimized oscillation isolation in the axial direction is achieved.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectUltrasonic vibration: Ultrasonic Vibration

Implementation Method 2

the press fit is calculated such that the yield point of the weaker material is not exceeded and that the material expansions are such that the press fit is effective across the entire temperature range.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal expansion: Thermal Expansion

Data Source

PatentUS9296255B2Device for the ultrasonic processing of a workpiece
Publication Date: 2016.03.29 HERRMANN ULTRACHALLTECHNIK GMBH & CO KG
  • US9296255B2 patent drawing
  • US9296255B2 patent drawing
  • US9296255B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to a device for the ultrasonic processing of a workpiece using an ultrasonic resonator and optionally a counter-die, the workpiece lying against the ultrasonic resonator and the ultrasonic resonator having a converter, a booster and a sonotrode. According to the disclosure, an additional booster is provided between the converter and the sonotrode and both boosters carry a holder for the ultrasonic resonator.