Dual Burner Emission Control Unit Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Diesel engines emit soot and other pollutants, necessitating effective emission abatement devices that can regenerate particulate filters and monitor engine performance to meet stringent regulatory standards.

Innovation Solution

An emission abatement assembly with a pair of fuel-fired burners under a single control unit, which includes a method to monitor and adjust burner temperature, fuel supply, and a control unit that uses sensors to detect soot accumulation, ash buildup, and other parameters to optimize filter regeneration and prevent damage to the system.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single control unit controls both burners, then device complexity is reduced, but reliability decreases due to single point of failure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol unit structureVSAvoidburner control reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit is segmented into separate functional modules: a microcontroller unit for logic control, a DAC module for signal conversion, and a driver circuit for power control. This modular segmentation allows individual components to be replaced or repaired without affecting the entire control system, thus maintaining reliability while keeping device complexity manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The control unit incorporates backup protection mechanisms including over-temperature shutdown circuits, over-current protection, and error detection algorithms that prevent system failure. These protective measures are built in advance to cushion against potential failures, ensuring continuous reliable operation of the burners.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

2Temperature

If temperature monitoring and fuel adjustment are implemented, then burner temperature control is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveburner temperature controlVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a closed-loop feedback control mechanism where temperature sensors continuously monitor burner temperature, the microcontroller compares readings against target values, and automatically adjusts fuel valve opening accordingly. This feedback loop achieves precise temperature control without requiring complex manual intervention systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control system performs self-regulation through automated temperature monitoring and fuel adjustment. The microcontroller autonomously manages the fuel valve based on temperature feedback, eliminating the need for external operators to manually adjust controls, thereby simplifying the operational complexity while maintaining precise temperature control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If continuous monitoring of soot accumulation and ash buildup is performed, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of energy increases due to continuous sensor operation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesoot and ash detection accuracyVSAvoidsensor energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of continuous monitoring, the system performs periodic measurements of soot accumulation and ash buildup at predetermined intervals. The microcontroller activates sensors only when needed for measurement cycles, significantly reducing energy consumption while maintaining sufficient measurement precision for effective regeneration scheduling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary assessments of filter loading conditions during normal operation and schedules regeneration operations in advance based on predicted soot accumulation levels. This preliminary action allows the system to prepare for regeneration without requiring continuous high-precision monitoring, reducing sensor energy consumption while maintaining operational effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively regenerates particulate filters, monitors engine performance, and prevents damage to the control unit by adjusting fuel supply and temperature, ensuring compliance with emission standards and extending the system's lifespan.

Implementation Method 1

An air pump positioned in the interior chamber of the housing generates reduced air pressure in the interior chamber which draws air into the housing and into the pump's inlet

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure gradient: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

This flow of air cools an electronic controller along with other components position in the housing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConvection cooling: Convection

Implementation Method 3

The filter or trap may be regenerated by use of a burner or electric heater to burn the soot trapped in the filter

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Data Source

PatentUS7685811B2Method and apparatus for controlling a fuel-fired burner of an emission abatement assembly
Publication Date: 2010.03.30 ET US HLDG
  • US7685811B2 patent drawing
  • US7685811B2 patent drawing
  • US7685811B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of operating a control unit of an emission abatement assembly includes communicating with an engine control unit of an internal combustion engine. An emission abatement assembly is also disclosed.