Dual-Cap Spray Nozzle With Angular Offset For Uniform Coverage

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing agricultural spray systems face challenges in efficiently and uniformly spraying agricultural fields, particularly in minimizing overlap between different spray areas and adapting to varying vehicle speeds and field topography.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a multi-cap nozzle system with a housing having a cavity for liquids, featuring first and second nozzle caps oriented at specific angles and offset from each other, coupled with a processor-controlled valve system that adjusts frequency and duty cycle to minimize overlap and ensure uniform coverage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If a single nozzle is used for spraying, then the device complexity is low, but the spray coverage uniformity and overlap control are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespray coverage uniformityVSAvoidnozzle structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The single nozzle is segmented into multiple nozzle caps (first nozzle cap, second nozzle cap, and optionally third nozzle cap) that are attached to a common housing. Each nozzle cap has its own nozzle channel oriented at different angles, allowing independent spray direction control while sharing a common liquid supply cavity, thus improving coverage uniformity without proportionally increasing complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The nozzle caps are oriented at different angles (first angle and second angle with respect to vertical axis, with offset angle between 0-45 degrees) to spray in different spatial dimensions. This angular distribution creates multiple spray areas that cover different portions of the field, transforming a single-direction spray into multi-dimensional coverage for improved uniformity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Manufacturing precision

If multiple nozzles are used to increase coverage, then the spray coverage uniformity improves, but the device complexity and chemical usage increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespray coverage uniformityVSAvoidchemical usage
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple nozzle caps are merged into a single integrated nozzle assembly with a common housing and shared liquid cavity. The nozzle caps can be controlled by a single valve or coordinated valve system, allowing them to operate as a unified multi-directional spray unit rather than independent nozzles, reducing overall system complexity and enabling coordinated operation to minimize chemical overlap and waste

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The nozzle caps are designed with adjustable or selectively controllable operation. The processor can dynamically control which nozzle caps are active based on detected field conditions, vehicle speed, and desired coverage patterns. This dynamic control allows the system to optimize chemical usage by activating only the necessary nozzle caps for current operating conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If the spray system operates at fixed parameters, then the device complexity is low, but the adaptability to varying vehicle speeds and field conditions is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to vehicle speedVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The spray system incorporates dynamic control where the processor adjusts operational parameters (such as duty cycle, frequency, and which nozzle caps are active) based on real-time vehicle speed and field conditions. This allows the nozzle assembly to adapt its spray pattern and intensity to match varying operating conditions, transforming a static system into a dynamically responsive one

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses imaging devices or sensors to detect field conditions and provides feedback to the processor, which then adjusts the nozzle cap operation accordingly. This closed-loop control enables the system to automatically adapt to varying vehicle speeds, terrain, and weed distribution patterns, improving versatility through intelligent feedback-based adjustment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Area of stationary object

If the nozzle caps are oriented at large angles, then the spray coverage area increases, but the overlap between spray areas increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespray coverage areaVSAvoidspray overlap control
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system optimizes the angular parameters of the nozzle caps (first angle, second angle, and offset angle between 0-45 degrees) to achieve the desired balance between coverage area and overlap control. By carefully selecting these angular parameters, the spray areas from different nozzle caps can be distributed to cover different portions of the field with minimal overlap, maximizing coverage efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250121384A1Dual-Cap Spray Nozzle and Selective-Spray System With Dual-Cap Spray Nozzles
Publication Date: 2025.04.17 CENTURE APPL LTD
  • US20250121384A1 patent drawing
  • US20250121384A1 patent drawing
  • US20250121384A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A dual-cap nozzle comprises a housing having a cavity to receive a liquid; a first nozzle cap attached to the housing, the first nozzle cap defining a first nozzle channel that is fluidly coupled to the cavity; and a second nozzle cap attached to the housing, the second nozzle cap defining a second nozzle channel that is fluidly coupled to the cavity. The first and second nozzle caps extend along first and second axes, respectively. An offset angle between the first and second axes is greater than or equal to about 0 degrees and less than or equal to about 45 degrees.