Dual Capacitive Touch Sensing for Moisture Rejection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing touch interface systems face challenges in balancing high sensitivity with reduced electric field projection and moisture rejection, particularly in applications requiring proximity detection rejection and moisture immunity.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of dual-touch measurement sensing techniques using a combination of driven-shield and grounded-shield self-capacitance sensing modes, where a first measurement is performed using either driven-shield or grounded-shield self-capacitance sensing, and a second measurement is performed using the other mode, with a touch detected only if both measurements indicate a touch.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If high sensitivity is increased to detect touches from bare and gloved fingers, then touch detection capability is improved, but proximity detection rejection deteriorates causing inadvertent detections

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetouch detection sensitivityVSAvoidproximity detection rejection
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The touch interface system segments the sensing function into two distinct measurement modes: self-capacitance sensing and mutual capacitance sensing. Each mode is optimized for specific detection requirements - self-capacitance for high sensitivity to bare and gloved fingers, and mutual capacitance for proximity rejection. The system processes measurements from both modes separately and combines them to achieve both high sensitivity and reliable proximity rejection simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Measurement precision

If sensitivity is increased to detect touches in cold temperatures, then touch detection capability is improved, but moisture-induced invalid touches increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetouch detection sensitivityVSAvoidmoisture-induced invalid touches
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces mutual capacitance sensing as an intermediary measurement mode that acts as a filter against moisture-induced false touches. While self-capacitance sensing is highly sensitive to all capacitive changes including moisture, mutual capacitance sensing requires direct finger contact through the display surface. By using mutual capacitance measurements as a verification layer, the system distinguishes between valid touches and invalid moisture detections, eliminating false positives while preserving high sensitivity for legitimate touches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If electric field projection is reduced to reject proximity detections, then proximity rejection is improved, but touch detection sensitivity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproximity detection rejectionVSAvoidtouch detection sensitivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges two different capacitance sensing approaches - self-capacitance and mutual capacitance - into a unified touch detection system. Self-capacitance sensing provides high sensitivity by detecting changes in self-capacitance values, while mutual capacitance sensing provides proximity rejection by detecting changes in mutual capacitance between transmitter and receiver electrodes. By combining measurements from both sensing modes and requiring agreement between them, the system achieves both high touch detection sensitivity and reliable proximity rejection without compromising either function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively enhances sensitivity while reducing unwanted proximity detections and moisture-induced invalid touches, thereby improving the overall performance and reliability of touch interface systems in diverse environmental conditions.

Implementation Method 1

a sensor comprising electrodes and shielding for the electrodes, the sensor configured to generate measurable signals responsive to capacitive changes at or near the sensor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapacitance: Capacitance

Data Source

PatentUS12216858B2Dual measurement for capacitive touch sensing and related systems, methods and devices
Publication Date: 2025.02.04 MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INC
  • US12216858B2 patent drawing
  • US12216858B2 patent drawing
  • US12216858B2 patent drawing

AI summary

One or more examples relate, generally, to a method for capacitive touch sensing that includes: performing first self-capacitance measurement of an electrode of a touch sensor while a driven shield-signal is provided to at least a portion of shielding of the electrode; determining a first touch sensing result at least partially responsive to determining that a value representing performing first self-capacitance measurement exceeds a first threshold value; performing second self-capacitance measurement of the electrode of the touch sensor while a ground signal is provided to at least the portion of shielding of the electrode; determining a second touch sensing result at least partially responsive to determining that a value representing performing second self-capacitance measurement exceeds a second threshold value, the second threshold value different from the first threshold value; and determining a touch result responsive to both the first touch sensing result and the second touch sensing result being indicative of a touch.