Dual Three-Way Catalytic Converter Lambda Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing LIN/BIN lambda probe system for gasoline engines operates in a narrow conversion window, leading to emissions breakthroughs due to deviations in lambda values from the setpoint, especially with modern engines having dynamic operation and numerous manipulated variables, resulting in unstable catalytic converter conditions.

Innovation Solution

The method involves operating two three-way catalytic converters in different oxygen states, with the first converter in a low-oxygen range for NOx reduction and the second in an oxygen-rich range for complete HC and CO conversion, using an NOx sensor as an NH3 sensor for control and secondary air for precise lambda management, and a binary lambda probe for controlling the second converter.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a single three-way catalytic converter is operated at lambda=1.000, then ideal conversion conditions are achieved, but the system is highly sensitive to deviations and causes emissions breakthroughs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemissions control stabilityVSAvoidcatalytic converter system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides a single catalytic converter into two separate catalytic converters with different functions. The first catalytic converter is operated in a slightly rich range (lambda < 1.000) optimized for NOx reduction, while the second catalytic converter is operated in a slightly lean range (lambda > 1.000) optimized for HC and CO oxidation. This segmentation allows each converter to operate in its optimal conversion window, reducing sensitivity to lambda deviations and preventing emissions breakthroughs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If the catalytic converter is operated in a narrow conversion window at lambda=1.000, then conversion efficiency is maximized, but small deviations lead to emissions breakthroughs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconversion stabilityVSAvoidlambda control precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different operational conditions to different parts of the exhaust gas treatment system. The first catalytic converter is operated in a slightly rich range (lambda < 1.000) with optimized conditions for NOx reduction, while the second catalytic converter is operated in a slightly lean range (lambda > 1.000) with optimized conditions for HC and CO oxidation. This local differentiation of operational parameters allows each converter to tolerate larger deviations from its setpoint without causing emissions breakthroughs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If larger catalytic converters with higher storage capacity are used, then emissions breakthroughs are avoided, but system volume and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemissions control reliabilityVSAvoidcatalytic converter volume
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSVolume of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the catalytic converter system into two smaller converters with distinct functions rather than using one large converter. The first converter handles NOx reduction in rich conditions, while the second converter handles HC and CO oxidation in lean conditions. This segmentation achieves reliable emissions control with smaller overall volume by allowing each converter to operate in its optimal conversion window with reduced storage capacity requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach provides stable exhaust gas aftertreatment, reduces emissions, allows for smaller catalytic converter volumes, and simplifies diagnosis, achieving robust control and lower emissions even in dynamic driving cycles.

Implementation Method 1

operating a first three-way catalytic converter arranged in the exhaust gas tract of the engine in a slightly low-oxygen range

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 2

operating a second three-way catalytic converter arranged downstream thereof in the exhaust gas tract of the engine in a slightly oxygen-rich range

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidation: Oxidation

Implementation Method 3

blowing secondary air into the exhaust gas tract between the two three-way catalytic converters

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDiffusion: Diffusion

Data Source

PatentUS11377994B2Method for exhaust gas aftertreatment, and exhaust gas aftertreatment system
Publication Date: 2022.07.05 VITESCO TECHNOLOGIES GMBH
  • US11377994B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for exhaust gas aftertreatment in a gasoline engine and an exhaust gas aftertreatment system are provided. In the method, two catalytic converters arranged in the exhaust gas tract of the gasoline engine are operated in different states. A first three-way catalytic converter is operated in a slightly low-oxygen range, and a second three-way catalytic converter is operated in a slightly oxygen-rich range. Secondary air is furthermore blown into the exhaust gas tract between the two three-way catalytic converters. It is thereby possible to reduce the output of emissions of the gasoline engine to a great extent. An exhaust gas aftertreatment system is likewise explained.