Dual Central Node Star Topology Network

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional star wireless communication networks are bottlenecked by a single central node, which can cause performance issues and single-point failures, and standby nodes are inefficient and unbalanced in workload, leading to reduced reliability and bandwidth inefficiency.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a dual adaptive central node system where two central nodes function equally, with a media access control (MAC) frame structure and protocols for alternating operational modes, transmission power control, and network management to ensure high reliability, availability, and bandwidth efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single central node is used in a star network, then the network structure is simple and easy to manage, but the central node becomes a performance bottleneck and a single point of failure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork structure complexityVSAvoidnetwork availability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The network is segmented into multiple central nodes instead of relying on a single central node. Each central node can independently manage a portion of the network, eliminating the single point of failure and distributing the management burden, thus maintaining simplicity while improving reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A standby central node is pre-configured and maintained in readiness before any failure occurs. This standby node monitors the active central node and is prepared to take over immediately upon failure, ensuring continuous network operation without interruption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If a standby central node is added to enhance reliability, then network availability improves, but bandwidth is wasted and workload becomes unbalanced during normal operation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork availabilityVSAvoidbandwidth efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The standby central node periodically exchanges control frames with the active central node to maintain synchronization and readiness. This periodic communication ensures the standby node can take over smoothly while minimizing bandwidth consumption compared to continuous full-duplex operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The standby central node remains in a low-power monitoring state during normal operation, continuously ready to detect failures. When needed, it transitions to active mode seamlessly, ensuring continuous network operation without significant bandwidth waste during peacetime.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Reliability

If a standby central node is added, then network reliability improves, but the standby node does not have full network knowledge and may not operate properly upon activation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork availabilityVSAvoidnetwork state information
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The active central node continuously provides feedback information to the standby central node through control frames, including network state, leaf node status, and operational parameters. This feedback mechanism ensures the standby node maintains up-to-date knowledge of the network state without requiring full active participation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

Control frames act as intermediaries to transfer critical network state information from the active central node to the standby central node. These frames carry essential data such as network configuration, active leaf nodes, and operational status, enabling the standby node to assume control smoothly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Productivity

If the central node has total control to coordinate operations and eliminate collisions, then network performance is predictable, but the central node becomes a performance bottleneck

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork performance predictabilityVSAvoidcentral node processing capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The coordination and control functions are segmented across multiple central nodes instead of concentrated in one node. Each central node handles coordination for its portion of the network, distributing the processing load and eliminating the bottleneck while maintaining predictable performance through structured control protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP2341755B1Wireless network with star topology and method for operating wireless network with star topology
Publication Date: 2017.05.10 MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC CORP
  • EP2341755B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2341755B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2341755B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A wireless network with a star topology has a first and second central node. The first central node starts up first and initiates the network. The second central node starts up second and synchronizes to the first central node, and wherein one node is in active mode and the other node is in standby mode, and a set of leaf nodes configured to communicate only with the active node.