Dual-Chamber Pacing Without Continuous Communication

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current implantable cardiac pacemakers require continuous communication between chambers for coordinated dual chamber pacing, which is inefficient and may not function effectively during atrioventricular (AV) block conditions, necessitating a solution for coordinated pacing without continuous beat-to-beat communication.

Innovation Solution

An implantable medical device system comprising an atrial and ventricular pacemaker that selects a limited set of pacing rates during AV block, allowing for coordinated dual chamber pacing by adjusting pacing rates and maintaining a target AV delay without direct communication between the pacemakers on a beat-by-beat basis.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If continuous communication between pacemakers is implemented for coordinated dual chamber pacing, then pacing coordination is improved, but device complexity and energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepacing coordinationVSAvoidcommunication system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the pacemaker functionality into independent atrial and ventricular pacemakers that operate autonomously without requiring continuous communication. Each pacemaker independently detects AV block and adjusts its own pacing rates from limited selections, eliminating the need for complex inter-device communication infrastructure while maintaining coordinated pacing through shared programming parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each pacemaker is designed to self-adjust its pacing rate by independently detecting AV block conditions and selecting appropriate rates from predetermined limited selections. The atrial pacemaker detects AV block and automatically adjusts both atrial and ventricular pacing rates without requiring communication with the other pacemaker, enabling self-service operation that reduces system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If continuous communication between pacemakers is implemented for coordinated dual chamber pacing, then pacing coordination is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepacing coordinationVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs periodic rate adjustments from limited selections rather than continuous communication and adjustment. Pacemakers transition between predetermined pacing rate selections based on detected AV block conditions, creating a periodic adjustment pattern that consumes minimal energy compared to continuous beat-to-beat communication and rate modification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

Each pacemaker independently detects AV block and autonomously selects pacing rates from limited predefined selections without requiring energy-consuming communication with the other pacemaker. This self-service mechanism dramatically reduces energy consumption while maintaining coordinated dual chamber pacing through shared programming parameters and independent operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If full plurality of pacing rates is available during AV block, then adaptability is improved, but pacing coordination becomes difficult without communication

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepacing rate selectionVSAvoidpacing coordination
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the pacing rate parameter from a full plurality of selectable rates to a limited selection of predetermined rates during AV block conditions. This parameter modification enables independent pacemaker operation while maintaining coordination, as both pacemakers select from the same limited rate set based on independently detected AV block, eliminating the need for complex communication while preserving adaptability within the constrained range.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides partial adaptability by offering a limited selection of pacing rates rather than the full plurality available during normal operation. This partial action approach is sufficient for coordinated pacing during AV block without requiring continuous communication, as the limited rate selections provide adequate adaptability for the specific AV block condition while simplifying the coordination mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentEP3285858B1System for dual-chamber pacing
Publication Date: 2019.03.20 MEDTRONIC INC
  • EP3285858B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3285858B1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2C
  • EP3285858B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

An implantable medical device system including an atrial pacemaker and a ventricular pacemaker is configured to deliver dual chamber pacing in the presence of atrioventricular block. In response to detecting the AV block, the atrial pacemaker may establish a limited number of selectable pacing rates. The atrial pacemaker selects a rate from the limited number of selectable pacing rates and adjusts the atrial pacing rate to the selected rate. The ventricular pacemaker is configured to establish a ventricular pacing rate that is equivalent to the selected rate in response to detecting the AV block. Other examples are described herein.