Dual-Classifier Crisis Detection Workflow

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing natural language processing (NLP) systems struggle to efficiently detect and respond to crisis situations in real-time, often resulting in either false negatives or false positives, which can lead to inadequate emergency responses.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a computer-implemented method that uses a dual-classifier approach, combining a pattern matching classifier and a trained machine learning classifier, to identify crisis situations. This method processes input phrases, generates a trigger signal if a crisis is detected, and executes an abatement protocol to mitigate the crisis, including presenting emergency contact information and crisis management tools.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a single classifier is used for crisis detection, then the system is simple and fast, but the detection accuracy is low with high false positive and false negative rates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrisis detection accuracyVSAvoidclassifier system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The crisis detection system is segmented into two independent classifiers: a pattern matching classifier for rule-based detection and a machine learning classifier for probabilistic detection. Each classifier operates independently on the input phrase, and their results are combined through a workflow engine. This segmentation allows each classifier to specialize in different aspects of crisis detection, improving overall accuracy while maintaining manageable complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system merges the outputs of two different classification approaches (pattern matching and machine learning) into a unified crisis detection decision. The workflow engine integrates results from both classifiers, allowing the system to leverage the strengths of each approach: the interpretability and speed of pattern matching combined with the adaptability and accuracy of machine learning, thereby resolving the contradiction between detection accuracy and system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Reliability

If real-time crisis detection is implemented, then emergency response time is reduced, but false positives increase leading to inadequate responses

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemergency response reliabilityVSAvoidcrisis detection precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where the workflow engine receives results from both classifiers and can adjust the detection process accordingly. When the pattern matching classifier identifies a potential crisis, the system can weigh this against the machine learning classifier's assessment, providing feedback that reduces false positives while maintaining rapid response capability. The dual-classifier architecture itself acts as a feedback system where each classifier validates or challenges the other's findings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial action by not requiring both classifiers to independently confirm a crisis before triggering an alert. Instead, the workflow engine can be configured to act on results from either classifier alone or in combination, depending on the specific implementation needs. This partial action approach enables real-time response while the dual-classifier design provides a check against excessive false positives through the complementary nature of the two detection methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12265791B2Emergency workflow trigger
Publication Date: 2025.04.01 WOEBOT LABS INC
  • US12265791B2 patent drawing
  • US12265791B2 patent drawing
  • US12265791B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Detection of crisis situations using multiple classifiers can enable fast and efficient processing of input phrases to determine if an abatement protocol should be executed. An input phrase can be passed through a pattern matching classifier and then through a trained machine learning classifier. If neither classifier identifies a crisis, the workflow can continue as usual. However, if a crisis is identified, confirmation of the crisis situation can be sought and used to further update one or both of the classifiers. If the crisis is confirmed, emergency information and crisis management tools can be presented to the user, among other mitigating actions. If the crisis is not confirmed, a prompt can be presented to the user to discuss the trigger phrase associated with the trigger signal.