Dual-Clutch Transmission Layout for Low-Loss Agricultural Shifting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current dual-clutch transmission architectures for agricultural vehicles suffer from high energy dissipation and inertia during gear shifting, leading to inefficient fuel consumption and increased weight, which affects performance and comfort across all working speed ranges.

Innovation Solution

The proposed dual-clutch transmission architecture features a staggered arrangement of clutches and gears, with axially offset even and odd clutches, and an intermediate shaft with wheels that split torque paths, allowing for efficient gear shifting with reduced weight and manufacturing complexity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If big wet clutches are used to allow shift between range gears, then gear shifting capability is improved, but energy dissipation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegear shifting capabilityVSAvoidenergy dissipation
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The transmission is divided into multiple stages (input stage, gear ratio stage, range gear ratio stage) with separate clutch assemblies for each function. Range clutches and gear clutches are independently controlled, allowing selective engagement without requiring large clutches to handle all shifting operations simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs a staggered axial arrangement of clutches where range clutches and gear clutches are positioned at different axial locations. This spatial separation allows independent torque paths and reduces the size requirements for individual clutches while maintaining full shifting capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Adaptability or versatility

If traditional DCT architecture is used, then powershift capability is provided, but weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepowershift capabilityVSAvoidtransmission weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple clutch assemblies (range clutches and gear clutches) are merged into a single integrated clutch housing structure. The shared housing and mounting infrastructure reduces overall weight compared to separate clutch assemblies while maintaining all powershift functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The clutch housing serves multiple functions: it houses both range clutches and gear clutches, provides mounting for all clutch assemblies, and acts as a structural element for the entire transmission. This multi-functionality reduces the need for additional separate components and reduces overall weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If traditional DCT architecture is used, then powershift transmission is achieved, but manufacturing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepowershift transmissionVSAvoidmanufacturing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The integrated clutch housing combines multiple clutch assemblies into a single manufacturable unit. This allows for more efficient production through unified casting or machining operations rather than assembling multiple separate housings, thereby reducing manufacturing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Loss of energy

If staggered clutch arrangement is used, then torque path efficiency is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetorque path efficiencyVSAvoidclutch arrangement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The clutch assembly employs an asymmetric staggered arrangement where range clutches and gear clutches are positioned at different axial locations rather than symmetrically. This asymmetric layout optimizes torque path length and reduces energy loss while the standardized clutch component design keeps manufacturing complexity manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Data Source

PatentEP4411171A1Double clutch architecture transmission for agricultural vehicles
Publication Date: 2024.08.07 CNH IND ITALIA SPA
  • EP4411171A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4411171A1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP4411171A1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

Architecture for a dual clutch transmission (1) for an off road vehicle provided with an input stage (A), a gear ratio stage (B) and a range gear ratio stage (C) operatively connected in series one to the other with respect to an input shaft (2) and an output shaft (3), the transmission (1) comprises selection elements (17) configured to selectively couple gears (14, 15,22) of gear ratio stage (B) and range gear ratio stage (C) to the respective first and second shafts (11, 12) and support shaft (23).