Dual-Coated SCR Catalyst for Diesel Exhaust Hydrocarbon Resistance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional SCR catalysts face a significant drop in nitrogen oxide conversion performance and hydrothermal aging stability due to elevated hydrocarbon concentrations in diesel exhaust gases, which are not effectively managed by existing hydrocarbon-resistant catalysts.

Innovation Solution

A dual-coated SCR catalyst with a transition metal-exchanged zeolite as the first coating and a small-pore zeolite or oxide layer as the second coating, where the second coating prevents hydrocarbons from contacting the first coating while allowing nitrogen oxides and ammonia to pass through, enhancing HC resistance and catalytic activity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional SCR catalysts are used in diesel exhaust gas aftertreatment systems, then nitrogen oxide conversion is achieved under normal conditions, but nitrogen oxide conversion performance drops significantly under elevated hydrocarbon concentrations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenitrogen oxide conversion performanceVSAvoidhydrocarbon concentration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The catalyst is divided into two distinct functional layers: a first layer containing the SCR active component (transition metal-exchanged zeolite) for nitrogen oxide reduction, and a second layer containing small-pore zeolite or oxide material that selectively adsorbs hydrocarbons. This segmentation allows each layer to perform its specific function independently, protecting the SCR active component from hydrocarbon deactivation while maintaining NOx conversion performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The second layer acts as an intermediary protective barrier between the harmful hydrocarbons and the SCR active component in the first layer. This intermediary layer selectively interacts with hydrocarbons through adsorption, preventing them from reaching and deactivating the SCR catalyst sites, while still allowing ammonia and nitrogen oxides to pass through to the first layer for the reduction reaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If existing hydrocarbon-resistant catalysts are used, then hydrocarbon resistance is improved, but hydrothermal aging stability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehydrocarbon resistanceVSAvoidhydrothermal aging stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The second layer utilizes small-pore zeolite or oxide materials with specific pore size distributions that are optimized to selectively adsorb hydrocarbon molecules while being resistant to hydrothermal degradation. The porous structure provides high surface area for hydrocarbon trapping without compromising the hydrothermal stability of the catalyst, as these materials maintain their structural integrity under high-temperature water-containing conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

Solution Approach 2:

The catalyst employs a composite structure combining two different material systems: the first layer with SCR-active transition metal-exchanged zeolite and the second layer with hydrocarbon-selective small-pore zeolite or oxide. This composite approach allows the catalyst to simultaneously achieve hydrocarbon resistance from the second layer and hydrothermal aging stability from the inherent stability of both material components, avoiding the degradation issues seen in single-material hydrocarbon-resistant catalysts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Reliability

If a dual-coated catalyst structure is implemented, then hydrocarbon resistance and catalytic activity are enhanced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalytic activityVSAvoidcatalyst structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The two functional layers are combined into a single integrated catalyst monolith or pellet structure, where the first SCR-active layer and the second hydrocarbon-resistant layer are co-formed or sequentially coated on the same support substrate. This merging approach maintains the benefits of dual functionality while simplifying the overall device structure compared to using separate catalyst components, reducing installation complexity, and ensuring proper flow distribution through the exhaust gas path.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The dual-coated catalyst structure performs multiple functions within a single component: the first layer provides nitrogen oxide reduction catalysis, while the second layer provides hydrocarbon adsorption and protection. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate catalyst units for NOx reduction and hydrocarbon management, simplifying the overall exhaust aftertreatment system design and reducing device complexity despite the enhanced functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The dual-coated catalyst maintains high nitrogen oxide conversion performance and improved hydrothermal aging stability, even under high hydrocarbon conditions, outperforming both conventional and hydrocarbon-resistant SCR catalysts in terms of HC resistance and catalytic activity.

Implementation Method 1

a second coating which covers the first coating on the exhaust gas side and is configured so as to prevent the contact of hydrocarbons having at least three carbon atoms present in the exhaust gas with the first coating beneath, without blocking the passage of nitrogen oxides and ammonia to the first coating

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhysical blocking: Filter (physical)

Implementation Method 2

a first catalytically active coating which has been applied directly to the support body and comprises a zeolite exchanged with one or more transition metals... for the selective catalytic reduction of nitrogen oxides with ammonia

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 3

the molecular sieve-like action, of the zeolite. The zeolites used are small-pore zeolites, especially ferrierite, chabazite and erionite, into which the hydrocarbons cannot penetrate because of their size

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdsorption: Adsorption

Data Source

PatentUS8926925B2SCR catalytic converter having improved hydrocarbon resistance
Publication Date: 2015.01.06 UMICORE AG & CO KG
  • US8926925B2 patent drawing
  • US8926925B2 patent drawing
  • US8926925B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A catalyst for the selective catalytic reduction of nitrogen oxides in diesel engine exhaust gases using ammonia or a precursor compound decomposable to ammonia. The catalyst includes two superposed coatings applied to a support body, of which the first coating applied directly to the support body includes a transition metal-exchanged zeolite and/or a transition metal-exchanged zeolite-like compound, and effectively catalyzes the SCR reaction. The second coating is applied to the first coating to cover it on the exhaust gas side and prevent hydrocarbons having at least three carbon atoms present in the exhaust gas from contacting the first coating, without blocking the passage of nitrogen oxides and ammonia to the first coating. The second coating may be formed from small-pore zeolites and/or small-pore, zeolite-like compounds, and from suitable oxides, especially silicon dioxide, germanium dioxide, aluminum oxide, titanium dioxide, tin oxide, cerium oxide, zirconium dioxide and mixtures thereof.