Dual Codebook Compression for Controlled Encoding and Simple Decoding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current data storage and transmission technologies face challenges with exponential data growth, inefficient data compaction, and security concerns, particularly with symmetrical codebooks and traditional entropy encoding methods that fail to account for previously unseen data and lack parametrized encoding capabilities.

Innovation Solution

A system and method utilizing dual codebooks, comprising a data codebook for encoding and decoding, and a behavior codebook for controlling encoding operations, enabling asymmetric compression and dynamic updates based on encoding efficiency metrics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional symmetrical codebooks are used for data compression, then both encoding and decoding can be performed with a single codebook, but the system lacks centralized control over encoding operations and cannot dynamically adapt to encoding efficiency metrics

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedynamic adaptation to encoding efficiencyVSAvoidcodebook structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the traditional single codebook into two separate codebooks: a data codebook containing codewords for actual data representation, and a behavior codebook containing rules and parameters that control encoding operations. This segmentation allows independent optimization of each codebook's function, enabling dynamic adaptation through the behavior codebook while maintaining the essential encoding/decoding capabilities through the data codebook.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The behavior codebook introduces dynamic parameters and rules that can be adjusted based on encoding efficiency metrics. The system can modify encoding behavior, select different codewords, or adjust compression strategies in real-time based on performance feedback, transforming the static codebook system into a dynamic, adaptive one.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If centralized control over encoding is implemented using a behavior codebook, then encoding efficiency can be optimized, but the decoding process becomes more complex as it requires coordination between data codebook and behavior codebook

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveencoding efficiencyVSAvoiddecoding process
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the control logic and behavioral rules from the encoding process and places them in a separate behavior codebook. This allows the data codebook to remain relatively simple for decoding operations, while the behavior codebook handles the complex decision-making. The decoder receives encoded data and can reconstruct information using the data codebook, with the behavior codebook providing necessary contextual rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Reliability

If dual codebooks are used for asymmetric compression, then security is enhanced through centralized encoding control, but the system requires more memory resources to store and manage two separate codebooks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveencoding securityVSAvoidmemory resources
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The behavior codebook serves multiple functions: it controls encoding operations, provides security parameters, manages compression strategies, and coordinates between encoder and decoder. By consolidating these control functions into a single multi-functional component, the system avoids the need for multiple separate control structures that would consume even more memory resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Loss of substance

If traditional entropy encoding methods are used, then data compaction is achieved, but the methods fail to account for previously unseen data and lack parametrized encoding capabilities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata compaction efficiencyVSAvoidhandling of unseen data
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The behavior codebook incorporates feedback mechanisms that allow the system to learn from encoding results and adjust its behavior accordingly. When previously unseen data is encountered, the system can modify its encoding strategy based on feedback from the behavior codebook, improving its ability to handle diverse data types while maintaining efficient compaction through the data codebook.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12566548B2System and method for asymmetric data compression using dual codebooks
Publication Date: 2026.03.03 ATOMBEAM TECH INC
  • US12566548B2 patent drawing
  • US12566548B2 patent drawing
  • US12566548B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for data compression using a two-codebook approach. The system creates and maintains two distinct codebooks: a data codebook containing codewords for encoding and decoding data, and a behavior codebook containing rules and configuration parameters that control how the data codebook is used. During encoding operations, both codebooks are required—the behavior codebook controls how the data codebook compresses the data. However, during decoding operations, only the data codebook is needed. This asymmetric architecture allows for secure distribution of decoding capabilities while maintaining control over encoding operations. The system can dynamically add new sourceblocks to the data codebook based on received data and supports machine learning optimization of encoding rules. This approach enables efficient data compression while providing granular control over encoding operations through the separate behavior codebook.