Dual Connectivity Access Barring via SCG Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current access barring mechanisms in dual connectivity scenarios, such as those involving a Master Cell Group (MCG) and a Secondary Cell Group (SCG), are inadequate for managing severe or rapidly increasing overload, potentially leading to Quality of Service (QoS) issues and outages for high-priority services like public safety during extreme situations.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a method for a wireless communication device and network node to perform access barring checks using SCG access barring information, allowing the Secondary Node (SN) to control overload by determining access categories and applying barring factors to manage resource usage across the SCG, thereby preventing network overload and ensuring QoS for critical services.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If access barring mechanisms are applied to manage system load, then system overload is reduced, but high-priority services may be blocked during extreme situations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess guarantee for high-priority servicesVSAvoidsystem access capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the access control mechanism into separate components for MCG and SCG, allowing independent access barring configurations. This segmentation enables the network to apply different barring factors and thresholds to different cell groups, ensuring that high-priority services can access through one group even when the other is overloaded.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements location-specific access control by applying different access barring parameters to different cell groups (MCG and SCG) based on their local load conditions. Each cell group can have customized barring factors, thresholds, and priority service configurations, allowing localized optimization without affecting the entire system uniformly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Adaptability or versatility

If unified access control is applied to both MCG and SCG, then overall system load is managed, but fine-grained control over SCG-specific overload is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess control flexibilityVSAvoidaccess control mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the access control mechanism into separate configurations for MCG and SCG, allowing the network to apply different barring factors, thresholds, and priority service rules to each cell group independently, enabling fine-grained control over SCG-specific conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal access control framework that can handle both MCG and SCG scenarios through a common mechanism. The same access control logic and priority service handling principles apply to both cell groups, providing versatility while maintaining manageable complexity through standardized procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If access barring is applied during normal operation, then system capacity is protected, but QoS for high-priority services deteriorates during extreme overload

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveQoS for high-priority servicesVSAvoidnetwork overload impact
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent configures access barring parameters in advance, including barring factors, thresholds, and priority service exemptions, so that when overload occurs, the system can immediately apply the pre-configured protective measures without delay, ensuring high-priority services are protected from the outset.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic access control by allowing the network to adjust barring factors and thresholds based on real-time load conditions in each cell group. The system can transition between different barring states and apply different levels of restriction to MCG and SCG independently, adapting to changing conditions while maintaining QoS for priority services.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20240323804A1Access control for dual connectivity
Publication Date: 2024.09.26 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
  • US20240323804A1 patent drawing
  • US20240323804A1 patent drawing
  • US20240323804A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method in a wireless communication device configured in dual connectivity with a master cell group, MCG, controlled by a master node, MN, and a secondary cell group, SCG, controlled by a secondary node, SN, to perform access barring check. The method includes receiving SCG access barring information. The method further includes identifying an access attempt. The method further includes determining an access category for the access attempt. The method further includes performing an access barring check for the access attempt using the access category determined and access barring information.