Dual-Connectivity Node Selection via MU-MIMO Grouping Efficiency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Wireless communication systems face challenges in spectral efficiency, particularly in densely populated areas where providing high aggregate throughput with limited spectrum is necessary, and existing dual-connectivity setups do not effectively leverage MU-MIMO grouping efficiency when selecting secondary nodes for enhanced data transmission.

Innovation Solution

The method involves evaluating the MU-MIMO grouping efficiency of potential secondary nodes to determine whether to establish dual-connectivity service and which node to use, based on their ability to provide efficient MU-MIMO service, by measuring the number of UEs served with MU-MIMO per unit time, and selecting nodes with higher MU-MIMO grouping efficiency for enhanced spectral efficiency and data capacity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If dual-connectivity service is established without considering MU-MIMO grouping efficiency, then connectivity coverage is improved, but spectral efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnectivity coverageVSAvoidspectral efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the selection parameter for secondary nodes from basic connectivity metrics to MU-MIMO grouping efficiency metrics. The master node evaluates candidate secondary nodes based on their MU-MIMO capability parameters (number of UEs served with MU-MIMO per unit time) and selects nodes that optimize spectral efficiency while maintaining connectivity coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If more secondary nodes are selected for dual-connectivity, then data transmission capacity is improved, but resource availability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata transmission capacityVSAvoidresource availability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the master node continuously monitors MU-MIMO grouping efficiency of candidate secondary nodes and adjusts dual-connectivity configuration accordingly. The selection of secondary nodes is based on real-time or periodic evaluation of their MU-MIMO performance, ensuring optimal resource utilization while maximizing data transmission capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11602000B1Use of MU-MIMO grouping efficiency as a basis to control configuration of dual-connectivity service
Publication Date: 2023.03.07 SPRINT SPECTRUM LLC
  • US11602000B1 patent drawing
  • US11602000B1 patent drawing
  • US11602000B1 patent drawing

AI summary

When a first access node is considering setup of dual-connectivity service for a UE, the first access node could take into consideration the MU-MIMO grouping efficiency respectively of each of one or more candidate second access nodes, in order to decide whether to set up the dual-connectivity service for the UE and/or to decide which of the multiple second access nodes to use for the UE's dual-connectivity service. MU-MIMO grouping efficiency of a given access node could be a representative count of UEs that the access node has provided with MU-MIMO service per unit time. Thus, for instance, the first access node may decide to use a given candidate second access node for the dual-connectivity service of the UE, with the decision being based on the given candidate second access node having a higher MU-MIMO grouping efficiency than one or more other candidate second access nodes.