Dual-Contact Drive Sprocket Teeth for Lower Friction Meshing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing drive sprockets and drive members do not transmit power efficiently due to significant loads causing relative movement between the drive member and the sprocket teeth, leading to inefficiencies in power transmission.

Innovation Solution

A drive sprocket design with symmetrical teeth featuring first and second engagement surfaces, defined by arcs, allowing dual contact points for engagement, and a roller chain with engagement pockets that articulate without direct contact with the sprocket teeth, reducing wear and friction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If a conventional drive sprocket with teeth is used to transmit power through a drive member, then power transmission is achieved, but significant loads cause relative movement between the drive member and sprocket teeth leading to inefficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower transmission efficiencyVSAvoidcontact stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The tooth is segmented into multiple engagement surfaces (first engagement surface and second engagement surface) that contact the drive member at different locations. This segmentation allows the load to be distributed across multiple contact points, preventing relative movement and improving power transmission efficiency while maintaining reliable engagement under significant loads.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of operation

If the tooth profile is made asymmetrical to improve engagement, then meshing capability is enhanced, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeshing capabilityVSAvoidtooth profile manufacturing
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The tooth profile employs asymmetrical engagement surfaces where the first engagement surface and second engagement surface are positioned at different radial locations and orientations. This asymmetry optimizes the meshing capability and load distribution while the overall tooth shape remains symmetrical about the radial axis, simplifying manufacturing processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

3Force

If the drive member makes direct contact with sprocket teeth under high load, then power transmission force is sufficient, but friction and wear increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower transmission forceVSAvoidfriction and wear
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The engagement surfaces are positioned at different radial dimensions, with the first engagement surface at one radial location and the second engagement surface at another radial location. This dimensional distribution allows the drive member to engage the tooth at multiple levels, distributing the load and reducing friction and wear while maintaining sufficient power transmission force.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS11566697B2Drive sprocket
Publication Date: 2023.01.31 NEW MOTION LABS LTD
  • US11566697B2 patent drawing
  • US11566697B2 patent drawing
  • US11566697B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A drive sprocket can include a plurality of teeth for meshing with a drive member to transmit rotary motion. The drive member can include a plurality of engagement pockets engaging the teeth of the drive sprocket, where each tooth has a tooth profile defined by a first side comprising a first engagement surface and an opposite second side comprising a second engagement surface, which engagement surfaces are configured such that when driven, a tooth meshes to the engagement pocket at a first contact location on the first engagement surface and also at a second contact location on the second engagement surface.