Dual Container Images for Cloud Debugging

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Debugging of applications in cloud computing platforms is challenging due to the lack of debugging capabilities in lightweight container images used during production, which do not include tools necessary for testing and debugging, leading to inefficiencies in identifying and fixing issues.

Innovation Solution

The use of dual container images, where a lightweight container image is optimized for production efficiency and a separate enhanced container image includes debugging capabilities, allowing developers to switch to the enhanced image for debugging purposes without sacrificing performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a lightweight container image is used for production deployment, then production efficiency and performance are improved, but debugging capabilities are lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction efficiencyVSAvoiddebugging capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The container image is segmented into two distinct versions: a lightweight container image optimized for production deployment with minimal footprint, and a full container image that includes complete debugging tools and capabilities. This segmentation allows each image type to be optimized for its specific purpose without compromise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a copy of the lightweight container image that includes additional debugging tools and capabilities. The full container image is essentially a copied version of the lightweight image with supplementary debugging components added, allowing developers to have both versions available for different operational contexts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Ease of operation

If debugging tools are included in the production container image, then debugging capability is improved, but container image size and resource consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedebugging capabilityVSAvoidcontainer image size
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Debugging tools are segregated into a separate full container image rather than being included in the lightweight production image. This segmentation ensures that production containers remain minimal and efficient while debugging capabilities are available when needed through the alternative full image version.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The container image configuration is changed based on operational needs. The system can switch between different container image parameters (lightweight vs. full) depending on whether production efficiency or debugging capability is the priority, allowing dynamic adaptation without permanent bloat.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If a full container image with debugging tools is used, then debugging capability is improved, but production performance and efficiency are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedebugging capabilityVSAvoidproduction efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically selects which container image version to use based on operational context. During normal production operations, the lightweight image is deployed for optimal performance. When debugging is required, the system transitions to the full container image, making the system adaptable rather than static.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The container platform is designed to support multiple functions through different image versions. The same platform can deploy lightweight images for production efficiency and full images for debugging, providing universal functionality that adapts to different operational requirements without sacrificing either performance or debugging capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Difficulty of detecting and measuring

If developers need to reproduce production issues, then problem identification is improved, but deployment complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveissue reproduction capabilityVSAvoiddeployment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Difficulty of detecting and measuringVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The full container image is created as a copy of the production lightweight image with added debugging capabilities. This copying approach ensures that the production environment is accurately replicated while adding only the necessary debugging tools, maintaining environmental fidelity without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The full container image acts as an intermediary between the lightweight production image and the debugging tools. It provides a bridge that allows developers to access production-like environments with debugging capabilities without directly modifying the production image or introducing complex deployment configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS10459823B1Debugging using dual container images
Publication Date: 2019.10.29 EMC IP HLDG CO LLC
  • US10459823B1 patent drawing
  • US10459823B1 patent drawing
  • US10459823B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A problem that occurs during execution of an application is debugged by building a lightweight container image and an enhanced container image. Data traffic for debugging is selected and the selected data traffic is copied using an enhanced copy. The problem is debugged using the enhanced container image and the selected data traffic.