Dual-Control Gas Pressure Regulator for Precision and Fail-Open Response

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing pressure regulators for gas distribution systems face challenges such as limited precision in regulation, requirement for on-site setting adjustments, and inability to maintain operation as a direct acting regulator in case of pilot device failure.

Innovation Solution

A pressure regulator design that combines a pilot-controlled first control head with a directly-controlled second control head, allowing for remote adjustment of setting pressure and ensuring operation as a direct acting regulator even if the pilot device fails.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If a direct acting pressure regulator is used, then the response time to pressure variations is quick, but the regulation precision is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse timeVSAvoidregulation precision
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The pressure regulator is divided into two independent control heads: a direct acting control head for quick response and a pilot controlled control head for precise regulation. Each control head operates independently but controls the same shutter, allowing the system to combine the advantages of both mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Measurement precision

If a pilot device is used for pressure regulation, then the regulation precision is improved, but the response time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveregulation precisionVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The pressure regulator is divided into two independent control heads: a direct acting control head for quick response and a pilot controlled control head for precise regulation. Each control head operates independently but controls the same shutter, allowing the system to combine the advantages of both mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Ease of operation

If a pilot device is used, then remote modification of setting pressure is enabled, but the system cannot operate as a direct acting regulator in case of pilot failure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveremote setting capabilityVSAvoidoperation continuity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system allows dynamic switching between two operational modes: pilot controlled mode for precise remote-adjustable regulation, and direct acting mode for quick response and fail-safe operation. This parameter change enables the system to adapt to different operational requirements and failure scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Ease of operation

If an adjusting screw is used for setting pressure, then on-site adjustment is possible, but labour costs increase due to required on-site operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesetting capabilityVSAvoidlabour cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The mechanical adjusting screw system is replaced with a pilot device that accepts electronic or remote control signals for setting pressure. This substitution eliminates the need for on-site manual adjustment operations, reducing labour costs and enabling remote configuration of the pressure regulator settings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides a pressure regulator with enhanced regulation reliability and quick response times, enabling remote management and ensuring continued operation in case of pilot device failure, while also facilitating a 'fail open' safety system.

Implementation Method 1

As long as the pressure in the motorization chamber is balanced with the force of the spring, the movable wall does not move. In the presence of a pressure perturbation, the movable wall moves until a condition of balance is restored and causes a corresponding movement of the shutter.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure balance: Pascal's Law

Implementation Method 2

a movable wall connected to the shutter and associated with a counter-thrust spring

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring force: Spring

Data Source

PatentEP3871060B1Pressure regulator and pressure regulation unit for gas distribution systems
Publication Date: 2025.02.12 PIETRO FIORENTINI SPA
  • EP3871060B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3871060B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3871060B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The present invention concerns a pressure regulator (10) for gas distribution systems, comprising: a connection body (11) for connection between an upstream pipe and a downstream pipe, the following elements being defined inside the connection body (11): an inlet duct (12), an outlet duct (13), a high- pressure chamber (14) connected to the inlet duct (12), a low-pressure chamber (15) connected to the outlet duct (13), a passage opening (16) between the high-pressure chamber (14) and the low-pressure chamber (15), a movable shutter (17) designed to obstruct the passage opening (16), means for moving the movable shutter (17) in a controlled manner. The means for moving the movable shutter (17) in a controlled manner comprise: a first main control head (18) fixed to the connection body (11) and configured to operate the movable shutter (17) through a first control rod (19), a second auxiliary control head (20) configured to operate the movable shutter (17) through a second control rod (21 ) fixed to the same movable shutter (17).