Dual Control Unit Architecture for Electromechanical Device Error Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electromechanical devices used in medical applications face reliability issues due to increased computational workload for error detection, potential malfunctions, and the risk of unregistered errors, especially in portable devices prone to jolts and mechanical stress, such as slipping and stalling in stepper motors.

Innovation Solution

A dual-control unit system where a main control unit provides feedback to both the control unit and a motion detector, enabling improved error detection and countermeasures, such as immediate stop or warning signals, to ensure reliable operation and prevent harmful consequences, while maintaining separate responsibilities for controlling and supervising the electromechanical device.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the control unit performs error detection by analyzing motion detector information, then error detection capability is improved, but computational workload increases and reliability may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror detection capabilityVSAvoidcomputational workload
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is divided into two independent units: a control unit that generates control signals and a main control unit that performs error detection. The motion detector information is fed back to the main control unit separately from the control unit's operational commands, segmenting the computational workload and allowing specialized error detection without overloading the primary control function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The motion detector serves as an intermediary component that provides independent verification of the electromechanical device's actual movement. By feeding motion detector information directly to the main control unit, the system creates an intermediate verification layer that compares intended movement with actual movement without requiring the control unit to perform complex analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Device complexity

If a single control unit handles both control and error detection, then device complexity is reduced, but reliability deteriorates due to potential malfunctions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system structureVSAvoiderror detection reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is segmented into distinct functional units: a control unit for generating control signals and a main control unit for error detection and safety monitoring. This segmentation ensures that a malfunction in one unit does not compromise the other, as they operate independently with separate processing paths.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The main control unit is pre-configured with error detection algorithms and safety protocols that activate before malfunctions can cause harm. By continuously monitoring motion detector information and comparing it with control signals, the system cushions against potential errors by detecting discrepancies early and triggering safety mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Reliability

If the electromechanical device is over-engineered to handle maximum load, then reliability is improved, but energy consumption and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice performance under loadVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The motion detector provides real-time feedback on the actual movement and load conditions of the electromechanical device. This feedback is processed by the main control unit to detect discrepancies between intended and actual movement, allowing the system to identify when the device is struggling under load without requiring excessive over-engineering.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically monitors operational parameters such as current draw, movement speed, and position accuracy to detect signs of overload or slipping. By changing operational parameters based on real-time conditions rather than static over-engineering, the system maintains reliability while optimizing energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP2793979B1Apparatus with a main control unit, a control unit and an electromechanical device
Publication Date: 2021.01.20 SANOFI AVENTIS DEUT GMBH
  • EP2793979B1 patent drawingFigure 1a~1b
  • EP2793979B1 patent drawingFigure 1c~2
  • EP2793979B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to an apparatus comprising an electromechanical device (8, 70), a control unit (4), a main control unit (2) and a motion detector (10, 10a), wherein said control unit (4) is configured to control said electromechanical device. The invention also relates to a method for operating an apparatus with a main control unit, a control unit and an electromechanical device. The technical problem of providing an apparatus with an electromechanical device, the reliability of which is improved, is solved by an apparatus wherein the main control unit is configured to provide information to the control unit. The motion detector and the main control unit are configured such that information about the movement of the electromechanical device is provided by the motion detector at least to the main control unit. The technical problem is also solved by a method for operating an apparatus, in particular an apparatus or medical device according to the invention.