Dual Controller System for Implantable Neurostimulator

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional neurostimulator controllers for implantable devices are bulky, intimidating, and overwhelming, leading to suboptimal patient compliance due to excessive features, and existing chargers are large and infrequently used, necessitating a more discreet and user-friendly solution for daily management of neurostimulation therapy.

Innovation Solution

A dual controller system comprising a small, pocket-sized controller for daily use with limited functions and a separate, full-featured controller charger for periodic maintenance, incorporating advanced features and a graphical user interface for ease of use, providing redundancy and comfort for patients.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional neurostimulator controllers include many features and functions, then device capability is improved, but device complexity and patient overwhelm increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice capabilityVSAvoidcontroller complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the controller into two distinct devices: a pocket-sized controller for daily use with limited functions (turning stimulation on/off, selecting programs, adjusting amplitude), and a larger charger-based controller for periodic use with advanced features (program frequency adjustment, pulse width control, individual pulse amplitude). This segmentation resolves the contradiction by assigning basic functions to the portable device and advanced functions to the charging device.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the charging function and advanced control features from the daily-use controller and places them in a separate charger-based controller. This allows the pocket controller to be minimized in size and complexity while maintaining essential therapeutic control capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Ease of operation

If neurostimulator controllers are made smaller for portability, then ease of carrying is improved, but device functionality is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveportabilityVSAvoiddevice functionality
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments functionality across two devices based on usage frequency and portability needs. The pocket controller contains only the most frequently used functions (stimulation control, program selection, amplitude adjustment), while less frequently used advanced functions (frequency adjustment, pulse width control) are placed in the charger-based controller.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The charger-based controller serves multiple purposes: it charges the implantable device battery and simultaneously provides access to advanced control functions. This multi-functionality resolves the contradiction by combining charging and advanced controls in a single device that does not need to be portable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If a single controller provides all functions, then device versatility is improved, but device size increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovefunctionalityVSAvoidcontroller size
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the controller system into two size-appropriate devices. The pocket controller is minimized to contain only essential daily functions, making it portable and unobtrusive. The charger-based controller houses advanced functions and charging capabilities, accepting that it will remain at home and not require portability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Ease of operation

If controllers are kept simple for ease of use, then patient compliance is improved, but device capability is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser-friendlinessVSAvoidtherapy control capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments control complexity across two devices. The pocket controller presents a simple interface for daily use, improving compliance by reducing cognitive load. The charger-based controller provides comprehensive therapy control capabilities for periodic adjustments by healthcare providers or knowledgeable patients.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP3117871B1Key fob controller for an implantable neurostimulator
Publication Date: 2020.06.03 NUVECTRA CORP
  • EP3117871B1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP3117871B1 patent drawingFigure 1B
  • EP3117871B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3

AI summary

Devices, systems, and methods incorporate the most-used functions of a electrical stimulator's controller into a small, thin pocket controller that is not only comfortable to carry in a pocket, but can also be attached to a key ring, lanyard, or other such carrying device for ease of daily use. A separate patient controller charger is used to charge and control the implanted medical device.