Dual-Controller Manufacturing Feedback for Product State Synchronization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional manufacturing systems lack effective feedback mechanisms to synchronize the digital and physical worlds, leading to inefficiencies and the need for extensive reconfiguration of control programs whenever products or machines change, resulting in incomplete production processes and limited machine flexibility.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a dual-controller system comprising Product Controllers (PCs) and Operation Controllers (OCs), where PCs manage desired product states, collect sensor data, and transmit instructions to OCs to achieve and maintain these states, allowing for separate management of product and machine changes without reconfiguring production lines.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a monolithic control program is used to manage both machine control and production control logic, then the control system is simpler in structure, but the system requires extensive reconfiguration whenever products or machines change

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system structureVSAvoidproduct and machine change flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the monolithic control program into two distinct controllers: a Product Controller (PC) that manages production control logic and a machine controller that manages machine operations. This segmentation allows independent modification of each controller without affecting the other, enabling flexible product and machine changes while maintaining system simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the production control logic from the machine control program by implementing a separate Product Controller. This extracted PC contains product-specific information and production logic, allowing it to be modified or replaced independently when products change, without requiring reconfiguration of the machine controller.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Ease of manufacture

If conventional feedback control loops using digital/analog signals are used to sense physical objects, then the control system is easier to implement, but the information retrieval is limited and indirect

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system implementationVSAvoidproduct and machine state information
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a comprehensive feedback mechanism where the Product Controller continuously receives real-time information about product and machine states from various sensors and sources. This feedback loop enables the PC to monitor the actual production process, compare it with the desired state, and trigger appropriate machine behaviors to correct deviations, thereby reducing information loss and improving state synchronization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If inspection stations are added at the end of the production line to detect incomplete boxes, then the detection capability is improved, but the system complexity and production time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct completion detectionVSAvoidproduction efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary detection and correction by having the Product Controller continuously monitor product state during the production process itself, rather than waiting for end-of-line inspection. The PC can detect incomplete boxes or deviations from the desired state and trigger corrective machine behaviors immediately, preventing defective products from being completed and eliminating the need for separate inspection stations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11385629B2Product closing the loop
Publication Date: 2022.07.12 SIEMENS AG
  • US11385629B2 patent drawing
  • US11385629B2 patent drawing
  • US11385629B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for managing physical assets in a manufacturing system includes a plurality of product controllers corresponding to physical assets in the manufacturing system. Each product controller is configured to store a desired product state for a physical asset and collect sensor data received from other digital companions. Furthermore, each product controller determines an actual product state based on the collected sensor data, as well as one or more actions to be performed on one or more physical assets in the manufacture system to yield the desired product state. Once the actions are determined, the product controller transmits control instructions for performing the one or more actions to one or more operation controllers in the manufacturing system.