Dual-Controller Trip Unit Self-Diagnosis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing circuit protection devices lack efficient monitoring and operational management of trip units, particularly in detecting health signals and determining appropriate actions in response to malfunctions, leading to potential nuisance trips and reduced operational reliability.

Innovation Solution

A circuit protection device with a first controller and a second controller, where the first controller monitors power characteristics and outputs health signals, and the second controller determines actions based on these signals to address potential issues with the first controller and tripping device, including a series of escalating corrective actions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a single controller is used in the trip unit, then the device complexity is reduced, but the reliability and self-correction capability are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrip unit reliabilityVSAvoidcontroller structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The trip unit controller is divided into two separate controllers: a first controller that monitors power characteristics and controls tripping, and a second controller that monitors the first controller's health signals. This segmentation allows each controller to specialize in specific functions, improving overall reliability while distributing complexity across multiple components rather than one overloaded unit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The second controller acts as an intermediary monitoring layer that watches the health signals from the first controller. This intermediary structure enables the system to detect malfunctions and implement self-correction without requiring complete redesign of the primary control architecture, thus improving reliability with manageable complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Difficulty of detecting and measuring

If comprehensive health signal monitoring is implemented, then the fault detection capability is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault detection capabilityVSAvoidmonitoring system
Core Design Contradiction:
Difficulty of detecting and measuringVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The first controller outputs multiple health signals (CPU operation status, power supply status, memory status, etc.) that provide continuous feedback about its operational state. The second controller monitors these feedback signals to detect malfunctions. This feedback mechanism improves fault detection capability by providing real-time information about controller health without requiring complex external monitoring systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The trip unit system performs self-diagnosis through the second controller monitoring health signals from the first controller. The system can detect its own malfunctions and implement self-correction actions without external intervention. This self-service approach improves fault detection capability while avoiding the need for additional external monitoring equipment that would increase device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If multiple corrective actions are implemented for different fault conditions, then the operational reliability is improved, but the ease of operation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational reliabilityVSAvoidsystem operation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamic corrective actions that adapt based on the specific malfunction detected. Different health signal failures trigger different correction strategies (resetting the first controller, tripping the circuit breaker, or both). This dynamic response approach improves operational reliability by matching the correction severity to the fault severity, while the automated nature of these actions maintains ease of operation without requiring manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS9214797B2Apparatus, systems, and methods for operation of a trip unit in a circuit protection device
Publication Date: 2015.12.15 ABB SPA
  • US9214797B2 patent drawing
  • US9214797B2 patent drawing
  • US9214797B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Apparatus, systems, and methods for operation of an electronic trip unit are described. One example is a method for use in operating an electronic trip unit including a first controller. The first controller is configured to selectively operate a tripping device coupled between an input terminal and an output terminal of the electronic trip unit. The method includes receiving, by a second controller, a plurality of health signals from the first controller. The second controller determines an existence of an undesired condition based on at least one of the plurality of different health signals, and determines a first action to be taken to remedy the undesired condition.