Dual Cord Blind Operating Assembly for Low-Force, Tangle-Resistant Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing dual cord operating systems for architectural coverings, such as vertical blinds, often require high pull force and are prone to entanglements, with the hand wand potentially kicking away from vertical alignment due to integrated housing and cord tension.

Innovation Solution

A dual cord operating system that couples a head rail cord loop with a separately configured control cord loop, providing mechanical advantage and reducing pull force, while maintaining the control cord loop in a configuration that minimizes entanglements and keeps the wand aligned.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single cord loop is used for operation, then the device complexity is reduced, but the pull force required increases and control precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecord loop configurationVSAvoidpull force
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The operating system divides the cord loop into two separate cord loops: a first cord loop for controlling head rail movement and a second cord loop for controlling vane rotation. This segmentation allows independent optimization of each cord's function, reducing the pull force required for each operation while maintaining overall system control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Device complexity

If the hand wand is integrated into the housing, then the device complexity is reduced, but the stability of wand alignment deteriorates due to cord tension

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehousing integrationVSAvoidwand vertical alignment
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The hand wand is extracted from the integrated housing configuration and positioned separately. This allows the wand to be guided independently by the first cord loop without being subjected to the combined tensions that would cause it to kick away from vertical alignment, while still maintaining a compact overall structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Ease of operation

If the control cord loop is positioned for easy access, then the ease of operation improves, but the likelihood of entanglements increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecord accessibilityVSAvoidentanglement resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The first cord loop is routed through the hand wand, utilizing the vertical dimension and the wand's rotational movement to guide the cord. This dimensional approach allows the cord to remain easily accessible for operation while preventing lateral displacement and entanglement that would occur with traditional horizontal routing near the operation point.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system reduces the required pull force for operation and minimizes entanglements, maintaining the hand wand's vertical alignment, thus enhancing user control and operational efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

The two cord loops may be coupled to provide mechanical advantage and reduced pull force for a user compared to systems in which the head rail cord and the control cord are coupled without a mechanical advantage

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Advantage: Mechanical Advantage

Data Source

PatentUS11021908B2Dual cord operating system for an architectural covering
Publication Date: 2021.06.01 HUNTER DOUGLAS INC
  • US11021908B2 patent drawing
  • US11021908B2 patent drawing
  • US11021908B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A covering for an architectural opening has a dual cord operating system. The covering may include a head rail, blind panels depending from the head rail, and an operating system. The operating system may include a housing connected to the head rail, a first drive assembly rotatably mounted within the housing and operable to move the blind panels between an extended configuration and a retracted configuration, and a second drive assembly rotatably mounted within the housing and operable to move the blind panels between a closed configuration and an open configuration.