Dual-Core Common Mode Inductor for Magnetic Interference Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Power electronic systems face challenges with near magnetic field coupling between components, leading to increased noise and reduced performance due to high-frequency magnetic interactions, which conventional inductor designs fail to adequately address.

Innovation Solution

The development of novel common mode (CM) inductor designs with reduced near magnetic field radiation and increased leakage inductance, utilizing two cores with strategically designed winding structures to minimize near magnetic field emissions and enhance high-frequency performance, while also increasing differential mode (DM) inductance for better noise attenuation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If conventional inductor designs are used, then magnetic field coupling between components is reduced, but near magnetic field radiation increases and high frequency performance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemagnetic field couplingVSAvoidnear magnetic field radiation
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The inductor is divided into two separate cores (first core and second core) with distinct winding structures. Each core handles specific current paths, segmenting the magnetic field generation and reducing overall near-field radiation while maintaining necessary inductance functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different winding structures are applied to different cores to optimize local magnetic field characteristics. The first winding structure on the first core and the second winding structure on the second core are specifically designed to minimize near-field radiation in their respective regions while achieving desired inductance values.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Ease of manufacture

If conventional inductor designs are used, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but leakage inductance is insufficient and noise attenuation performance is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinductor fabricationVSAvoidleakage inductance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The inductor functionality is segmented across two cores, with each core contributing to the total leakage inductance. This segmentation allows each core-winding combination to be optimized for manufacturability while collectively achieving superior leakage inductance performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The leakage inductance contributions from both cores are combined to achieve total leakage inductance values that exceed what a single conventional inductor could provide. The merging of magnetic paths from two cores creates additive inductance effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Quantity of substance

If inductor size is reduced to increase power density, then power density improves, but magnetic field emissions increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower densityVSAvoidmagnetic field emissions
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The winding structures on each core are specifically designed with local quality optimizations that minimize magnetic field emissions from each core individually. This allows compact core designs while maintaining low emission characteristics through optimized local winding geometries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The design converts what would normally be harmful near-field magnetic radiation into beneficial leakage inductance. The winding structures are configured so that magnetic fields that would otherwise radiate outward are instead channeled to contribute to leakage inductance, simultaneously reducing emissions and improving noise attenuation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

These designs effectively reduce near magnetic field radiation, enhance DM inductance for improved noise attenuation, and increase power density, offering superior performance in electromagnetic interference (EMI) filters by attenuating CM noise at higher frequencies with reduced magnetic field emissions.

Implementation Method 1

A first winding structure is wound around a first core and a second winding structure is wound around a second core. The first and second winding structures may be wound in opposite directions such that a differential mode (DM) current flowing through the first and second winding structures generates magnetic flux that flows through both the first and second cores in opposite directions.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

A magnetic circuit for the CM inductor embodiment is derived and shows how the magnetic flux flows through the cores and air gaps. The magnetic circuit analysis demonstrates how the dual-core structure with opposing flux directions reduces external magnetic field emissions while maintaining internal flux confinement.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic reluctance: Magnetic Reluctance

Data Source

PatentUS11232896B2Inductor designs for reducing magnetic interference
Publication Date: 2022.01.25 UNIV OF FLORIDA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC
  • US11232896B2 patent drawing
  • US11232896B2 patent drawing
  • US11232896B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Inductor designs and methods are provided. An inductor can include a first core and a second core. The first core can be larger than the second core and the second core can be seated within the inner diameter of the first core. A first and a second wire can be provided that each wrap around the first core and the second core. The first core can have less windings than the second core.