Dual-Cover Receptacle Assembly for Portable Device Shock Absorption

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing portable electronic devices lack effective protection against shocks and impacts during transportation, particularly in bags and carriers, which can lead to damage and malfunction.

Innovation Solution

A dual-layered protection system comprising a cradle unit and a sling unit, where the sling unit fits inside the cradle unit, creating an air gap for shock absorption, and features perforations and extrusions for enhanced shock dampening and elastoplasticity, with the cradle unit providing structural rigidity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a portable electronic device is placed inside a bag without specialized protection, then the bag remains simple and easy to use, but the device lacks adequate protection against shocks and impacts during transportation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice protectionVSAvoidprotection system structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sling unit is nested inside the cradle unit, creating a compact dual-layer protection system. The sling unit fits within the cradle unit's interior space, allowing both protective elements to be integrated without significantly increasing the overall size or complexity of the bag structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The air gap between the sling unit and cradle unit is pre-configured to provide shock absorption before impact occurs. This predetermined cushioning space is designed to deform and absorb impact forces during transportation, protecting the device without requiring active intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

2Strength

If rigid protective cases are used to protect the device, then shock resistance improves, but the device becomes heavier and bulkier

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshock resistanceVSAvoidprotection system weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The sling unit is constructed from flexible materials that can deform to absorb impact forces. This flexible membrane structure provides protective functionality without the weight penalty of rigid protective cases, as flexible materials achieve comparable protection with significantly reduced mass.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The air gap between the sling unit and cradle unit creates a pneumatic cushioning system. This trapped air space acts as a compressible medium that absorbs shock forces during impact, providing effective protection without adding significant weight, as air itself is negligible in mass.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

3Object-affected harmful factors

If thick protective layers are added around the device, then impact absorption improves, but the available space in the bag decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact absorptionVSAvoidspace utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The sling unit is nested inside the cradle unit, maximizing space utilization by placing the inner protective layer within the outer structure. This nested configuration ensures that the protective elements occupy minimal additional volume while still providing effective impact absorption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The sling unit uses thin flexible material that provides protective functionality without requiring thick layers. This thin-film approach maintains adequate space within the bag while still delivering effective impact absorption through the flexible membrane's deformation characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

4Reliability

If simple single-layer protection is used, then the protection system remains simple and compact, but shock absorption and impact resistance are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshock absorptionVSAvoidprotection system structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sling unit is nested inside the cradle unit, creating a compact dual-layer protection system. This nested configuration provides enhanced shock absorption through multiple protective layers while maintaining a space-efficient structure that doesn't significantly increase overall complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The air gap between the sling unit and cradle unit is pre-configured to provide shock absorption before impact occurs. This predetermined cushioning space works in conjunction with the dual-layer structure to enhance protective capability without requiring complex active systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively absorbs shocks and reduces impact forces, ensuring the device's safety and stability within bags and carriers, enhancing protection and reducing the risk of damage.

Implementation Method 1

A closed end of the sling unit is configured to sit higher than a closed end of the cradle unit, creating an air gap between the sling sitting and the cradle unit. The air gap provides shock absorption for the device.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShock absorption: Compression

Implementation Method 2

The sling unit may also include a perforation(s) of the composite material of the sling unit. The perforation(s) provide a slinging motion of the device, which helps increase shock absorption, provide shock dampening from the motions of the device, and/or increase elastoplasticity of the composite material of the sling unit.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShock dampening: Damping

Implementation Method 3

The perforation(s) provide a slinging motion of the device, which helps increase shock absorption, provide shock dampening from the motions of the device, and/or increase elastoplasticity of the composite material of the sling unit.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastoplasticity: Plasticity

Data Source

PatentUS12604957B2Device cover assemblies for portable device protection inside receptacles
Publication Date: 2026.04.21 TARGUS INTERNATIONAL LLC
  • US12604957B2 patent drawing
  • US12604957B2 patent drawing
  • US12604957B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosure describes a system or an apparatus for providing protection for a device. In one aspect, the system or the apparatus includes an outer cover and an inner cover. The inner cover fits inside the outer cover, and the device may be inserted inside the inner cover. A closed end of the inner cover sits higher than a closed end of the outer cover, creating an air gap between the closed ends of the inner and outer covers. The air gap may provide shock absorption for the device. The inner cover may also include one or more perforations of the composite material of the inner cover. The one or more perforations may provide a slinging motion of the device, which help increase shock absorption, provide shock dampening from the motions of the device, and/or increase elastoplasticity of the composite material of the inner cover.