Dual-CPU Comparator Circuit for Early Semiconductor Failure Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing semiconductor devices lack the ability to predict and adapt to failure locations, as they do not have a function to identify specific failure points within the device, leading to ineffective operation changes during abnormal conditions.

Innovation Solution

A semiconductor device comprising a first circuit, a second circuit with a comparable configuration but different operating margins, and a comparator to detect mismatches in output signals, allowing for predictive maintenance and operation adjustments based on detected failures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If an independent evaluation circuit is used to detect deterioration, then detection capability is improved, but the ability to identify specific failure locations deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection capabilityVSAvoidfailure location information
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The invention divides the monitoring function into multiple segments: the evaluation circuit detects deterioration, while the tag circuit identifies the specific failure location. This segmentation allows both detection capability and location information to be preserved simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The tag circuit acts as an intermediary that links the evaluation circuit's detection function with the main body circuit's operational function. When deterioration is detected, the tag circuit provides location information that enables targeted operational changes without requiring the evaluation circuit to directly control the main body.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If operation changes are made based on general deterioration detection, then device reliability is improved, but the ability to adapt to specific failure locations deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice reliabilityVSAvoidadaptation to failure location
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the response mechanism into two parts: the evaluation circuit provides general deterioration detection for reliability, while the tag circuit provides specific location information for adaptability. This allows operation changes to be tailored to specific failure locations rather than applying generic responses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The tag circuit is pre-configured with identification information for different failure locations before deterioration occurs. When the evaluation circuit detects deterioration, the pre-prepared tag information enables immediate adaptation to the specific failure location, improving both reliability and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Device complexity

If a simple deterioration detection system is used, then device complexity is reduced, but the ability to predict and respond to specific failures deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidfailure prediction precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The tag circuit is a simplified copy or counterpart to the evaluation circuit, designed specifically for identification rather than complex detection. This copying approach adds minimal complexity while providing precise failure location information that enhances prediction accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The tag circuit serves multiple functions: it identifies failure locations, provides prediction information, and enables targeted operational changes. This multi-functionality achieves high prediction precision without requiring a proportionally complex system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20100308867A1Semiconductor device and abnormality prediction method thereof
Publication Date: 2010.12.09 RENESAS ELECTRONICS CORP
  • US20100308867A1 patent drawing
  • US20100308867A1 patent drawing
  • US20100308867A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A semiconductor device includes a first CPU, a second CPU having a configuration that is the same as or comparable to a configuration of the first CPU, and a comparator that compares an output of the first CPU with an output of the second CPU. The second CPU is made so as to have a lower operating margin than the first CPU. By supplying a same signal to the first CPU and the second CPU and then detecting a mismatch between the outputs of the first CPU and the second CPU as a result of comparison, the abnormality is predicted. The semiconductor device includes a reset control circuit that resets the device when the result of comparison by the comparator indicates an error.