Dual Current Controller for Inverter Phase Selection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional protection functions in power networks fail to accurately detect faulted phases for inverter-interfaced renewable energy sources due to differences in fault current signatures compared to synchronous generators, leading to maloperation and potential disconnection of healthy phases or failure in distance protection.

Innovation Solution

The controller adjusts both negative and positive-sequence-current angles to mimic synchronous generator fault current angles, allowing the traditional current-angle-based phase selection method to operate correctly while maintaining the ability to control reactive power, using a proportional resonance controller in the stationary frame to reduce relay delay and eliminate the need for synchronous frame calculations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the inverter is controlled to generate fault currents with different signatures from synchronous generators, then the inverter can operate independently with its own control objectives, but conventional protection functions fail to accurately detect faulted phases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinverter control flexibilityVSAvoidprotection function accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The controller dynamically adjusts the fault current signature parameters (magnitude, phase angle, harmonic content) to match synchronous generator characteristics during fault conditions, enabling conventional protection functions to operate accurately while maintaining inverter control flexibility during normal operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The inverter controller transitions between different operational modes: during normal operation it maintains independent control objectives, but during fault detection it dynamically adapts its current signature to mimic synchronous generators, allowing both operational requirements to be satisfied at different times

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If the protection algorithms are modified to accommodate inverter fault current signatures, then accurate fault detection can be achieved, but the complexity of the protection system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault detection accuracyVSAvoidprotection algorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of modifying protection algorithms to recognize inverter signatures, the inverter controller creates a copy of the synchronous generator fault current signature characteristics, allowing existing conventional protection algorithms to function without modification

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

Rather than changing the protection system to adapt to the inverter, the approach is inverted: the inverter changes its behavior to adapt to the existing protection system, maintaining simplicity in the protection algorithms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Measurement precision

If the inverter controller adjusts current angles to mimic synchronous generators, then phase selection accuracy is improved, but the ability to control reactive power independently is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvephase selection accuracyVSAvoidreactive power control capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The controller implements periodic switching between different control modes: during fault detection periods it adjusts current angles to mimic synchronous generators for accurate phase selection, while during normal operation periods it restores independent reactive power control capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The controller dynamically adjusts the degree of signature mimicry based on system conditions, allowing flexible transition between prioritizing phase selection accuracy and maintaining reactive power control independence

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11374407B1Dual current controller of inverter interfaced renewable energy sources for accurate phase selection method and grid codes compliance
Publication Date: 2022.06.28 KING ABDULAZIZ UNIV
  • US11374407B1 patent drawing
  • US11374407B1 patent drawing
  • US11374407B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for correct operation of the current-angle-based phase-selection method (PSM) is based on a proper dual current controller (DCC) for inverter interfaced sources during unbalanced fault conditions. The fault type is determined in the inverter using voltage-angle-based PSM. Accordingly, fault-type zones' bisectors of the current-angle-based are determined. Consequently, an initial negative-sequence current angle reference is determined to force the relative angle between the negative- and zero-sequence currents in the center of its correct fault-type zone. The initial positive-sequence current angle is determined according to reactive current requirements by grid codes. These initial angles are updated for accurate operation of the PSM and appropriate reactive current injection. Negative- and positive-sequence current references are determined in the stationary frame to comply with the reference angles and inverter's thermal limits. These references are regulated by a proportional-resonance controller.