Dual-Cutter Food Processing for Overlapping 3D Mesh Shapes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing food processing devices are limited in the variety of shapes they can create, particularly for complex or high-volume applications, as they often rely on two-dimensional cutting methods that restrict the potential forms of food items.

Innovation Solution

A food processing apparatus with two cutting means, each having specific diameters and orientations, allows for overlapping cuts to create a three-dimensional basket, grid, or mesh effect, utilizing helical cutting formations to enhance shape flexibility.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a single cutting means is used, then the device structure is simple, but the shape variety is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshape varietyVSAvoiddevice structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cutting device is segmented into multiple independent cutting means (first cutting means and second cutting means), each capable of producing different cut patterns. This segmentation allows the device to create complex three-dimensional basket, grid, or mesh effects by combining multiple cuts, thereby increasing shape variety without requiring a completely new device for each shape.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention transitions from two-dimensional cutting (single plane) to three-dimensional cutting by introducing cutting means with different orientations and angular positions. The first and second cutting means are arranged at different angles relative to the central axis, enabling cuts in multiple dimensions that create complex spatial structures and varied shapes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple cutting means are used, then shape flexibility is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshape flexibilityVSAvoiddevice structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cutting means are arranged in a nested configuration where the first and second cutting means are positioned concentrically around the central axis. The cutting means can be nested within each other or arranged in a compact nested structure, allowing multiple cutting functions to be integrated in a space-efficient manner, thereby managing device complexity while maintaining shape flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

Each cutting means is designed with universal functionality to perform multiple cutting operations. The cutting means can be adjusted in angular position and orientation to create different cut patterns, allowing a single cutting means to serve multiple functions. This multi-functionality reduces the need for numerous specialized components, thereby controlling device complexity while achieving shape flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Shape

If overlapping cuts are made, then three-dimensional basket/grid/mesh effect is produced, but the manufacturing precision requirement increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethree-dimensional structureVSAvoidcut alignment
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The cutting means are pre-positioned at specific angular positions and orientations before the cutting operation begins. The first and second cutting means are arranged in advance with predetermined angular separations and radial positions, ensuring that overlapping cuts will produce the desired three-dimensional basket, grid, or mesh effects. This preliminary positioning reduces the precision requirements during actual operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The cutting means are designed with adjustable angular positions and orientations that can be dynamically modified during operation. This dynamic adjustability allows for compensation of minor positioning variations and enables optimization of cut overlap patterns. The ability to dynamically adjust cutting parameters reduces the stringency of manufacturing precision requirements while maintaining the desired three-dimensional structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12365107B2Food processing apparatus
Publication Date: 2025.07.22 DONAGHY ENGINEERING LTD
  • US12365107B2 patent drawing
  • US12365107B2 patent drawing
  • US12365107B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A food processing apparatus for the cutting of foodstuff comprising a first cutter having a cross/sectional shape defining a first maximal external diameter and a first minimal internal diameter about a first central axis. A second cutter having a cross-sectional shape defining a second maximal external diameter and a second minimal internal diameter about a second central axis is also provided. The second maximal external diameter of the second cutter is greater than or equal to the first minimal internal diameter of the first cutter. In use, the foodstuff is cut by the second cutter before being cut by the first cutter, or alternatively the first cutter may make the first cut with the second cutter making a second subsequent cut.