Dual Density Pressure Pad for Orthopedic Force Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Rigid pressure pads cause discomfort due to non-conformity with anatomical contours and create spikes in reactive force, while soft pads distribute force poorly, requiring additional force and potentially cutting off circulation.

Innovation Solution

A dual-density pressure pad with a soft outer layer and a rigid interior support, allowing for localized and distributed force application that contours to anatomical structures, using materials with varying Shore A hardness to manage force dissipation and comfort.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If rigid materials are used in pressure pads, then structural support and force transfer are improved, but comfort and anatomical conformity deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural supportVSAvoiddiscomfort
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The pressure pad uses a composite structure combining rigid material (for structural support and force transfer) with soft material layers (for comfort and anatomical conformity). This composite approach allows the device to simultaneously achieve both structural integrity and user comfort by leveraging the complementary properties of different materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The pressure pad applies different material properties to different regions: rigid material in areas requiring structural support and force transfer, and soft material in areas requiring comfort and anatomical conformity. This local differentiation of material properties resolves the contradiction between strength and comfort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Force

If rigid materials are used in pressure pads, then force transfer effectiveness is improved, but reactive force spikes worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforce transfer effectivenessVSAvoidreactive force spikes
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The pressure pad incorporates soft material layers before the rigid structural component, creating a cushioning effect that absorbs and distributes impact forces. This prior cushioning prevents reactive force spikes while maintaining the force transfer effectiveness of the rigid material underneath.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Solution Approach 2:

The composite structure of soft and rigid materials works together to manage force dynamics: the soft material attenuates impact peaks while the rigid material ensures effective force transfer to the target anatomy, resolving the contradiction between force effectiveness and reactive force spikes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Object-affected harmful factors

If soft materials are used in pressure pads, then comfort and anatomical conformity are improved, but force transfer effectiveness deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecomfortVSAvoidforce transfer effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The pressure pad combines soft material (for comfort and conformity) with rigid material (for force transfer effectiveness). The soft material layer maintains contact with anatomical surfaces while the rigid layer ensures adequate force transfer, resolving the contradiction between comfort and force effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

Different material properties are assigned to different functional zones: soft material in contact with anatomy for comfort, rigid material for force transfer. This local quality differentiation allows the device to simultaneously achieve both comfort and effective force transfer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Shape

If soft materials are used in pressure pads, then anatomical conformity is improved, but force distribution becomes too broad

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanatomical conformityVSAvoidforce distribution concentration
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The soft outer material conforms to anatomical shapes while the rigid internal structure maintains focused force distribution. This composite approach prevents the force from being overly distributed while maintaining anatomical conformity through the soft exterior.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The soft material provides anatomical conformity in contact areas while the rigid material underneath maintains localized force concentration. This local differentiation of material properties resolves the contradiction between conformity and force concentration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The dual-density design improves comfort by providing localized pressure and distributed force, reducing discomfort and reactive force spikes, while maintaining effectiveness in muscle flexion.

Implementation Method 1

pads including soft materials tend to compress easily distributing force over a larger area

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression: Compression

Implementation Method 2

The use of multiple material densities allows for force dissipation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS10327977B2Dual density pressure pad
Publication Date: 2019.06.25 3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES CO
  • US10327977B2 patent drawing
  • US10327977B2 patent drawing
  • US10327977B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided are orthopedic, dual density pressure pads designed to transfer pressure onto a focused anatomical structure; typically through the assistance of a device that applies a perpendicular or downward force. The pad includes an outer layer including a relatively soft material and an interior support including a rigid material, with the interior support typically having a substantially greater hardness than the outer layer.